We compared a published computational model of the action potential of a specific type of human induced pluripotent stem cell -derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CM) with experimental field potential data with regard to their inter-beat interval and the duration of repolarization. In particular, concomitant changes in inter-beat interval and duration of repolarization were calculated after reduction and/or augmentation of specific ion channel conductances as a surrogate for pharmacological manipulation. The observed mismatches between calculations and experimental data indicate that there is information missing about the cellular test system. Based on our results we hypothesize that, among other currents, the actual If ("funny current") may deviate from the prediction. We show that replacement of the If formulation by alternative equations causes the model predictions to change qualitatively, however, none of the available formulations is actually achieving a satisfactory match with experimental data. We suggest a strategy to clarify whether the mismatch can be completely resolved at all using single cell models and, if yes, how this goal could be reached.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733510PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0221763PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

inter-beat interval
12
interval duration
12
duration repolarization
12
specific type
8
type human
8
human induced
8
induced pluripotent
8
pluripotent stem
8
experimental data
8
comparison vitro
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!