Introduction: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is a method of treatment for patients who are temporally ineligible for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This procedure allows one to select patients with severe left ventricle dysfunction or with symptoms of unknown origin who can benefit from AVR or TAVI.
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and outcome of therapy in patients treated with balloon aortic valvuloplasty. To define clinical characteristics, immediate and distant outcomes of the procedure, and factors affecting the 12-month mortality.
Material And Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the procedural and clinical outcomes of 47 consecutive patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent balloon aortic valvuloplasty in our center.
Results: Age and logistic EuroSCORE were 76.81 ±6.64 and 22.85 ±13.74, respectively. The mean gradient after the procedure decreased from 52.23 ±18.21 to 35.52 ±13.43 mm Hg ( = 0.001). Major complications occurred in 5 (10.6%) patients. In-hospital, 30-day and 1-year mortalities were 6.38%, 10.63% and 42.55%, respectively. 31.9% of patients underwent the destination therapy (TAVI or AVR). One-year mortality in the group treated conservatively after BAV was 56.2%, while in the group treated with AVR or TAVI it was 13.3%. Procedural success, presence of arterial hypertension, and performance of the destination therapy were factors associated with a decreased 1-year mortality.
Conclusions: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty should be treated as a bridge-to-decision on further treatment. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty has high efficacy and an acceptable adverse events rate. Patients undergoing balloon valvuloplasty are high-risk patients with many comorbidities.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6727237 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aic.2019.86012 | DOI Listing |
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
January 2025
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Patients with unstable hemodynamics and unstable pelvic ring injuries are still demanding patients regarding initial treatment and survival. Several concepts were reported during the last 30 years. Mechanical stabilization of the pelvis together with hemorrhage control offer the best treatment option in these patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTurk Kardiyol Dern Ars
January 2025
Department of Cardiology, Gülhane Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Türkiye.
Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) following surgical repair of the mitral valve poses a significant clinical challenge. Patients who have undergone surgery are typically at high risk for a second operation. This report details the case of a 54-year-old male who underwent aortic valve replacement and mitral valve repair using a 34-ring, 14 years prior.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The use of mechanical circulatory support devices for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has increased over the past decade despite limited data of benefit. We sought to examine the association between intravascular microaxial left ventricular assist device (LVAD) versus intra-aortic balloon pump use in patients without cardiogenic shock (CS) undergoing PCI.
Methods And Results: This retrospective study analyzed claims data from a large, insured population who underwent PCI without CS from April 1, 2016 to July 31, 2022.
Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep
December 2024
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Background: Direct mechanical ventricular actuation (DMVA) with the Anstadt cup is effective for non-blood-contacting biventricular support. Pneumatic regulation of a silicone device augments ventricular pump function. Vacuum attachment facilitates diastolic augmentation critical for biventricular support.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Cardiol Heart Vasc
February 2025
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Objective: The objective was to evaluate the relationship between carotid stenting and off-pump coronary artery grafting (CAS-OPCABG) and OPCABG only in patients with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis.
Methods: This study retrospectively included 669 patients with asymptomatic severe carotid artery stenosis who underwent OPCABG at multiple centers. After propensity score matching for baseline characteristics, the study compared two groups of patients with clinical data, early and midterm death, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!