AI Article Synopsis

  • Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) involve pain in jaw muscles and joints, and this study compared the effectiveness of applied relaxation (AR) with stabilisation splint (SS) treatment over 12 months.
  • A total of 96 university students with TMD symptoms were randomly assigned to either the AR (51) or SS (41) group, with assessments of pain and other symptoms at multiple follow-up points.
  • Results indicated that while neither treatment significantly reduced TMD pain, AR was more effective in improving psychological well-being and reducing general pain symptoms compared to SS.

Article Abstract

Background: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) include pain and dysfunction in masticatory muscles and temporomandibular joints (TMJs). Applied relaxation (AR) is a coping skill that may be applicable for treatment of TMD.

Objectives: The aim of this randomised, controlled study was to evaluate the effectiveness of AR as compared to stabilisation splint (SS), for treatment of TMD during 12-month follow-up.

Methods: The data were derived from 96 university students seeking treatment due to TMD symptoms at Finnish Student Health Service in Finland. The subjects were randomly divided into two treatment groups: SS (n = 41) and AR (n = 51) groups. Clinical TMD examinations (a modified version of DC/TMD, Axis I) were performed for both the groups at baseline and 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Depressive and non-specific physical symptoms (NSPS) were estimated with Axis II questionnaire (RDC/TMD), and a number of other pain sites were screened at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Data were analysed by means of chi-square test for both groups on five variables, t test for VAS pain intensity and repeated measures ANOVA for palpation pain at follow-up points. Statistical significance was set on P < .05.

Results: Decrease in the number of painful masticatory muscles and TMJs and VAS on pain intensity did not differ between groups. During follow-up, NSPS and number of body pain sites decreased significantly more in the AR than the SS group. The dropout was 56 patients.

Conclusion: Neither of the treatments showed more benefit in decreasing local TMD pain. AR gave more benefit on psychological well-being and general pain symptoms.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.12884DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

applied relaxation
8
splint treatment
8
temporomandibular disorders
8
treatment tmd
8
baseline 12-month
8
treatment
5
effectiveness applied
4
relaxation method
4
method splint
4
treatment temporomandibular
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!