A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Efficacy of Vinorelbine Monotherapy as Third- or Further-Line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. | LitMetric

Background: The survival rate of patients with lung cancer has increased significantly over the years, but there has been no further progress in third- or fourth-line therapy. We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with weekly vinorelbine, a semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who had previously been treated several times.

Methods: In all, 159 NSCLC patients who received vinorelbine monotherapy as third- or further-line therapy between January 2008 and July 2017 were included in this study. Patients received vinorelbine intravenously at a dose of 25-30 mg/m2/week.

Results: Their mean age was 62.4 years. The histologic types of tumor were adenocarcinoma (50.9%), squamous cell carcinoma (42.8%), and others (6.2%). The overall response rate was 19.5% (31/159). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5-3.5 months), and the median overall survival (OS) after vinorelbine use was 7.6 months (95% CI 6.2-9.0 months). Vinorelbine therapy showed significantly higher efficacy in patients with adenocarcinoma, and these patients had a longer PFS than patients with other types of cancer. Patients who received vinorelbine as fifth- or further-line treatment had a higher response rate and longer PFS and OS than those who received vinorelbine as third- or fourth-line treatment.

Conclusions: Weekly vinorelbine monotherapy may be a feasible therapeutic option for patients with heavily treated, advanced NSCLC, particularly lung adenocarcinoma.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000502343DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

received vinorelbine
16
vinorelbine monotherapy
12
lung cancer
12
patients received
12
patients
10
monotherapy third-
8
third- further-line
8
further-line therapy
8
advanced non-small-cell
8
non-small-cell lung
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!