Robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is progressively gaining momentum. It seems to provide some potential advantages over open approach. Unfortunately, only few studies investigated the impact of RPD on the oncologic outcomes. We performed a 1:1 case-matched comparison between two groups of 35 patients affected by a malignant tumor who underwent RPD and open (OPD) pancreaticoduodenectomy from August 2014 to April 2016. Operative time was longer in the RPD group compared to OPD (355 vs 262 min, p = 0.023), whereas median blood loss (235 vs 575 ml, p = 0.016) and length of hospitalization (6.5 vs 8.9 days, p = 0.041) were lower for RPD. A significant reduction of overall postoperative morbidity rate was found in the RPD group compared to the OPD group (31.4% vs 48.6% p = 0.034). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of overall pancreatic fistula rate, R0 resection rate, and number of harvested lymph nodes. The overall and disease-free survival at 1 and 3 years were similar. RPD is a safe and effective technique. It reduces the estimated blood loss, the length hospital of stay and the rate of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy, while preserving a good oncologic adequacy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-01018-w | DOI Listing |
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Spine Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
The bioactive glass-ceramic spacer (BGS)-7, a biosynthetic intervertebral fusion material introduced in 2014, has not been the subject of comparative clinical studies on anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. This study, for the first time, aims to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of the renewed BGS-7, released in 2019, with those of an allograft spacer. The comparison includes a finite element analysis of the biomechanical properties of each implant, adding a novel dimension to the research.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBone
January 2025
Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance Department, Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS), Calle Campezo n° 1, Edificio 8, 28022 Madrid, Spain. Electronic address:
J Natl Cancer Inst
October 2024
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Purpose: Data on type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk after breast cancer (BC) could guide preventive strategies. Yet, studies had limitations regarding sample size, follow-up, and contemporary treatments. We evaluated the risk of T2D after BC overall, by cancer treatment, and compared with a matched cohort of cancer-free women.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFForensic Sci Int
November 2024
EPSRC Future Metrology Hub, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK. Electronic address:
Many methods of ballistic toolmark comparison rely upon comparison using 2D greyscale imaging. However, newly emerging analysis methods such as areal surface analysis now utilise an extra dimension of measurement allowing the surface heights/depths of unique toolmark features to be recorded in a densely populated (x,y,z) array for a 3D/areal quantitative comparative analysis. Due to this step change, the colloquialism in referring to the crater produced at the centre of the primer during firing as a "firing pin impression" has become a misnomer, leading some to believe that this toolmark is produced via a single process, where the critical variable is the condition of the firing pin.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAllergy
October 2024
Scottish Centre for Respiratory Research, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!