News stories, advertising campaigns, and political propaganda often repeat misleading claims, increasing their persuasive power. Repeated statements feel easier to process, and thus truer, than new ones. Surprisingly, this illusory truth effect occurs even when claims contradict young adults' stored knowledge (e.g., repeating The fastest land animal is the leopard makes it more believable). In four experiments, we tackled this problem by prompting people to behave like "fact checkers." Focusing on accuracy at exposure (giving initial truth ratings) wiped out the illusion later, but only when participants held relevant knowledge. This selective benefit persisted over a delay. Our findings inform theories of how people evaluate truth and suggest practical strategies for coping in a "post-truth world."
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104054 | DOI Listing |
R Soc Open Sci
January 2025
Arizona State University, Glendale, AZ, USA.
Numerous psychological findings have shown that incidental exposure to ideas makes those ideas seem more true, a finding commonly referred to as the 'illusory truth' effect. Under many accounts of the illusory truth effect, initial exposure to a statement provides a metacognitive feeling of 'fluency' or familiarity that, upon subsequent exposure, leads people to infer that the statement is more likely to be true. However, genuine beliefs do not only affect truth judgements about individual statements, they also imply other beliefs and drive decision-making.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCogn Sci
December 2024
Institut Jean-Nicod, Département d'Etudes Cognitives, ENS; EHESS, PSL University Paris France; CNRS.
We investigate the articulation between domain-general reasoning and interpretive processes in failures of deductive reasoning. We focus on illusory inferences from disjunction-like elements, a broad class of deductive fallacies studied in some detail over the past 15 years. These fallacies have received accounts grounded in reasoning processes, holding that human reasoning diverges from normative standards.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPNAS Nexus
November 2024
Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 100 Main St, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Content moderators review problematic content for technology companies. One concern is that repeated exposure to false claims could cause moderators to come to believe the very claims they are supposed to moderate, via the "illusory truth effect." In a first lab-in-field experiment ( = 199) with a global content moderation company, we found that exposure to false claims while working as moderators increased subsequent belief among (mostly Indian and Philippine) employees by 7.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProc Natl Acad Sci U S A
November 2024
Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin 14195, Germany.
Nearly five billion people use and receive news through social media and there is widespread concern about the negative consequences of misinformation on social media (e.g., election interference, vaccine hesitancy).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPsychon Bull Rev
October 2024
Dipartimento Di Psicologia Dello Sviluppo E Della Socializzazione, DPSS - Università di Padua, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padova, Italy.
The repetition of a statement increases its credibility, a phenomenon known as the illusory truth effect. Here we tested whether the illusory truth effect persists across languages and scripts. In two experiments, Italian-English (n = 80) and Greek-English (n = 66), unbalanced bilinguals were exposed to 60 written unknown trivia statements in English.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!