Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) accounts for nearly 10% of gastric cancer. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) plays a crucial role in cancer progression. However, there is no experimental study on the regulation mechanism of EBV on COX-2 in EBVaGC. To understand more about the tumorigenic mechanism of EBVaGC, the study investigated the role of EBV encode latent membrane protein LMP1 and LMP2A in the regulation of COX-2. The expression of COX-2 was examined in EBVaGC and EBV negative gastric cancer (EBVnGC) cell lines. The plasmids were transfected in SGC7901 to overexpress LMP1/2A. Small interfering RNA (si-RNA) targeting LMP1/2A in GT38 and targeting TRAF2 in SGC7901 were used to detect the expression of COX-2. Furthermore, si-ERK1/2 and the MEK inhibitor PD0325901 were used to investigate whether p-ERK participate in the regulation of COX-2 in SGC7901. The overexpression of LMP1 or LMP2A in SGC7901 down-regulates both COX-2 and TRAF2 expression, and knockdown of LMP1 or LMP2A in GT38 resulted in a certain recovery of COX-2 and TRAF2 expression. Moreover, si-TRAF2 indicated that a sharp down-regulation of COX-2. And the decrease of p-ERK also mediates the inhibitory effect of LMP1 on COX-2. In summary, overexpression of LMP1 and LMP2A inhibits COX-2, which is mediated by a decrease of TRAF2, and p-ERK is involved in the inhibition of COX-2 by LMP1 in gastric cancer.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2019.197735 | DOI Listing |
Langenbecks Arch Surg
December 2024
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama City, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Purpose: Gastric cancer (GC) remains a major malignancy. Robotic gastrectomy (RG) has gained popularity due to various advantages. Despite those advantages, many hospitals lack the necessary equipment for RG and are still performing laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) due to its established minimal invasiveness and safety.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAdv Sci (Weinh)
December 2024
Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Poor response to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) remains an obstacle in the treatment of gastric cancer (GC). Super enhancers (SEs) are crucial for determining tumor cell survival under drug pressure. SE landscapes related to 5-FU-resistance are mapped to GC using chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-Seq).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFScand J Gastroenterol
December 2024
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Background And Study Aims: Diffuse infiltrative gastric cancer can be difficult to diagnose owing to a lack of endoscopic features in the superficial mucosa. Moreover, a forceps biopsy may not reveal a pathological diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and 'open-lid submucosal biopsy', a technique wherein EMR followed by biopsy of the ulcer floor is performed for a pathological diagnosis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHistopathology
December 2024
Goethe University Frankfurt, Medical Clinic 1, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Aims: Anti-claudin-18.2 (CLDN18.2) therapy was recently approved for the treatment of gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Surg
December 2024
General Surgery Section, Zherong County Hospital, No. 8 Shangqiao Road, Ningde, Fujian, 355300, China.
Background: To investigate the effect of postoperative supplementary parenteral nutrition (SPN) containing varying energy intake levels during the early postoperative period on the clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with gastric cancer.
Methods: Data from 237 patients, who were diagnosed with gastric cancer between January 2016 and June 2022, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on mean daily SPN energy intake: low (L-SPN; < 20 kcal/kg/day); and high (H-SPN; ≥ 20 kcal/kg/day).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!