Evaluation of raw-data-based and calculated electron density for contrast media with a dual-energy CT technique.

Objectives: The aim of the current study is to evaluate the accuracy and the precision of raw-data-based relative electron density (RED) and the calibration-based RED (RED) at a range of low-RED to high-RED for tissue-equivalent phantom materials by comparing them with reference RED (RED) and to present the difference of RED and RED for the contrast medium using dual-energy CT (DECT).

Methods: The RED images were reconstructed by raw-data-based decomposition using DECT. For evaluation of the accuracy of the RED, RED was calculated for the tissue-equivalent phantom materials based on their specified density and elemental composition. The RED images were calculated using three models: Lung-Bone model, Lung-Ti model and Lung-Ti (SEMAR) model which used single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR). The difference between RED and RED was calculated.

Results: In the titanium rod core, the deviations of RED and RED (Lung-Bone model, Lung-Ti model and Lung-Ti model with SEMAR) from RED were 0.45%, 50.8%, 15.4% and 15.0%, respectively. The largest differences between RED and RED (Lung-Bone model, Lung-Ti model and Lung-Ti model with SEMAR) in the contrast medium phantom were 8.2%, -23.7%, and 28.7%, respectively. However, the differences between RED and RED values were within 10% at 20 mg/ml. The standard deviation of the RED was significantly smaller than the RED with three models in the titanium and the materials that had low CT numbers.

Conclusion: The RED values could be affected by beam hardening artifacts and the RED was less accurate than RED for high-Z materials as titanium.

Advances In Knowledge: The raw-data-based reconstruction method could reduce the beam hardening artifact compared with image-based reconstruction and increase the accuracy for the RED estimation in high-Z materials, such as titanium and iodinated contrast medium.