Prenatal genetic testing for cystic fibrosis: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness and an ethics review.

Genet Med

Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Published: February 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of prenatal testing for cystic fibrosis (CF) and considered the impact of ethical factors on decision-making.
  • A systematic literature review revealed that the genetic test is reliable; however, most pregnancies with two CF variants ended in termination, suggesting a significant influence on parental choices and mental health.
  • The researchers concluded that the value of CF testing should focus more on enhancing patients' autonomy in decision-making rather than solely on reducing the number of CF births.

Article Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to assess the clinical value of prenatal testing for cystic fibrosis (CF) and whether ethical considerations would affect endpoint selection.

Methods: To determine effectiveness, we conducted a systematic literature review whose protocol outlined search strategies across eight databases, study inclusion criteria, and prespecified literature screening, data extraction, and synthesis processes. We conducted a scoping search on ethical considerations.

Results: The genetic test showed good diagnostic performance. A change in clinical management was observed: termination of pregnancy (TOP) occurred in most cases where two pathogenic variants were identified in a fetus of carrier parents (158/167; 94.6%). The TOP rate was lower in pregnancies where CF was diagnosed after fetal echogenic bowel detection (~65%). TOP and caring for a child with CF were both associated with poor short-term parental psychological outcomes. Ethical analyses indicated that informed decisions should have been the main endpoint, rather than CF-affected births prevented.

Conclusion: CF testing leads to fewer CF-affected births. It is difficult to assess whether this means the test is valuable, since patients may not value TOP primarily in terms of maternal or fetal health outcomes, psychological or otherwise. The value of testing should arguably be measured in terms of improving patient autonomy rather than health.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-019-0641-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

testing cystic
8
cystic fibrosis
8
cf-affected births
8
prenatal genetic
4
testing
4
genetic testing
4
fibrosis systematic
4
systematic review
4
review clinical
4
clinical effectiveness
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!