Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ab2d92 | DOI Listing |
Int J Health Policy Manag
December 2024
Health Sciences Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
In this paper we draw upon the review article "Re-evaluating Our Knowledge of Health System Resilience During COVID-19: Lessons from the First Two Years of the Pandemic" by Saulnier et al to propose some additional themes to be considered regarding ongoing conversations on health system resilience. Complementing the lessons learned brought forward in the article, we propose three thematic areas which may enrichen this conversation. These three themes are posed as questions: (1) Transformation - towards what? (2) Crises and shocks - what counts as such? and (3) Levels and scales - can tensions be reconciled? While our insights are strongly rooted in research results on health system resilience during COVID-19 in Finland, we seek to discuss their wider implications for health system resilience and beyond the context of a single country.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Health Policy Manag
December 2024
Center for Evidence-based Diplomacy, Global Health Research and Innovations Canada Inc. (GHRIC), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Borges and colleagues' article entitled "More Pain, More Gain! The Delivery of COVID-19 Vaccines and the Pharmaceutical Industry's Role in Widening the Access Gap," analyzes the role of pharmaceutical companies in providing equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines. They concluded that with the failure of COVID-19 Vaccine Global Access (COVAX), the health gaps have widened due to the profit-driven pharmaceutical sector. In this commentary, we highlight the role of COVAX and its attempt to bridge some access gaps since its inception and the need for reforms in policy-making and global health governance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Health Policy Manag
December 2024
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Ubels and van Raaij provide a valuable account of the operation of novel hospital/medical specialist enterprise (MSE) contracts in a Dutch healthcare system shaped by market reform. However, their analytical distinction between the separate domains of contractual and relational governance frames the contractual domain more narrowly than does the relational contract theory widely deployed in socio-legal studies. The authors' conclusion that contract plays little or no part in governing relations between hospitals and MSEs leads them to underplay a wider realm of contractual practices that develop in the shadow of the written contract.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJAMA Intern Med
January 2025
Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco.
JAMA Pediatr
November 2024
Department of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!