A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Audiologic, surgical and subjective outcomes of active transcutaneous bone conduction implant system (Bonebridge). | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assessed the effectiveness of the Bonebridge (BB) device for improving hearing in patients with mixed/conductive hearing loss (MCHL) and single-sided deafness (SSD) by reviewing surgeries performed between 2015 and 2017.
  • Complete implantation of the BB was successful for all patients with an intact canal wall, and both groups experienced significant functional hearing gains—31.4 dB for SSD and 37.6 dB for MCHL.
  • Patients reported improved speech recognition in quiet and noisy environments, with overall satisfaction indicating that the BB positively impacted their quality of life without surgical complications.

Article Abstract

Our objective was to evaluate the surgical restrictions, audiologic benefits and satisfaction from using an active transcutaneous bone conduction device (BCD), Bonebridge (BB) in patients with mixed/conductive hearing loss (MCHL) or single-sided deafness (SSD). A retrospective review from all patients who underwent BB surgery at the Pusan National University Hospital from 2015 to 2017 for SSD or MCHL was performed. Twenty-two patients with SSD and five with MCHL had a BB implanted and analysed. Complete transmastoid implantation of the device was possible for all patients with an intact canal wall (ICW), using lifts if necessary. The overall functional hearing gain (FHG) in SSD and MCHL was 31.4 and 37.6 dB, respectively. The mean percentage of speech recognition in a quiet was 81% ( 11% unaided) for MCHL group and 82% ( 29% unaided) for SSD group. Mean speech recognition scores in noise improved significantly under various signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for both groups. Questionnaires showed overall improvement, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. The BB provides improved functional gain, and there were no limitations during surgery despite the large device. Both MCHL and SSD group had benefit and improved quality of life with BB.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2019.1657242DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ssd mchl
12
active transcutaneous
8
transcutaneous bone
8
bone conduction
8
speech recognition
8
ssd group
8
mchl
6
ssd
6
audiologic surgical
4
surgical subjective
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!