AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to establish a new D-dimer threshold for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) specific to the Japanese population, as the existing thresholds were based on data from Western countries where PE incidence is much higher.
  • Conducted in a Japanese emergency department, the retrospective study analyzed 395 patients and found that a D-dimer threshold of 1100 μg/L resulted in a 0% failure rate for PE detection, suggesting safer exclusions of unnecessary imaging tests.
  • The findings indicate that the new threshold could effectively reduce CTPA use in Japanese patients, with potential applicability to other Asian populations, but further research is required to confirm these results.

Article Abstract

Background: In the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE), the D-dimer threshold is based on studies conducted in Western countries, where the incidence rate is 5 times higher than that in Asian countries, including Japan. If we could elevate the D-dimer threshold based on the low pre-test probability in the Japanese population, we could omit the computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) which might lead to radiation exposure and contrast-induced nephropathy. Therefore, we aimed to determine a new D-dimer threshold specific to Japanese individuals.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at an emergency department in Japan, using medical charts collected from January 2013 to July 2017. We included patients whose D-dimer were measured for suspicion of PE with low or intermediate probability of PE and CTPA were performed. The primary outcome was failure rate of the new D-dimer threshold, defined as the rate of PE detected by CTPA among patients with D-dimer under the new threshold ranging from 1000 to 1500 μg/L by 100. The new D-dimer threshold was appropriate if the upper limit of 95% confidence interval of the failure rate of PE was approximately 3%.

Results: In 395 patients included, the number of patients with PE was 24 (the prevalence was 6.1%). If the D-dimer threshold was 1100 μg/L, the failure rate was 0% (0/119), the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the failure rate was 3.1%, and 30% (119/395) of the CTPA might be omitted.

Conclusion: The new D-dimer threshold could safely exclude PE. This result can be generalized to other Asian populations with a lower incidence of PE. Further prospective studies will be needed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712646PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-019-0242-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

d-dimer threshold
36
failure rate
16
d-dimer
10
pulmonary embolism
8
retrospective cohort
8
cohort study
8
threshold
8
threshold based
8
patients d-dimer
8
upper limit
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!