Human vision supports social perception by efficiently detecting agents and extracting rich information about their actions, goals, and intentions. Here, we explore the cognitive architecture of perceived animacy by constructing Bayesian models that integrate domain-specific hypotheses of social agency with domain-general cognitive constraints on sensory, memory, and attentional processing. Our model posits that perceived animacy combines a bottom-up, feature-based, parallel search for goal-directed movements with a top-down selection process for intent inference. The interaction of these architecturally distinct processes makes perceived animacy fast, flexible, and yet cognitively efficient. In the context of chasing, in which a predator (the "wolf") pursues a prey (the "sheep"), our model addresses the computational challenge of identifying target agents among varying numbers of distractor objects, despite a quadratic increase in the number of possible interactions as more objects appear in a scene. By comparing modeling results with human psychophysics in several studies, we show that the effectiveness and efficiency of human perceived animacy can be explained by a Bayesian ideal observer model with realistic cognitive constraints. These results provide an understanding of perceived animacy at the algorithmic level-how it is achieved by cognitive mechanisms such as attention and working memory, and how it can be integrated with higher-level reasoning about social agency.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12775 | DOI Listing |
Commun Biol
December 2024
Brain and Cognition, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
The functional organization of the human object vision pathway distinguishes between animate and inanimate objects. To understand animacy perception, we explore the case of zoomorphic objects resembling animals. While the perception of these objects as animal-like seems obvious to humans, such "Animal bias" is a striking discrepancy between the human brain and deep neural networks (DNNs).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Behav Neurosci
December 2024
Department of Neurophysiology, Niigata University School of Medicine, Niigata, Japan.
Animacy perception, the ability to discern living from non-living entities, is crucial for survival and social interaction, as it includes recognizing abstract concepts such as movement, purpose, and intentions. This process involves interpreting cues that may suggest the intentions or actions of others. It engages the temporal cortex (TC), particularly the superior temporal sulcus (STS) and the adjacent region of the inferior temporal cortex (ITC), as well as the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Hum Neurosci
November 2024
Professorship for Social Brain Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) and robots are increasingly shaping the aesthetic preferences of art consumers, influencing how they perceive and engage with artistic works. This development raises various questions: do cues to the humanness of the origin of an artwork or artist influence our aesthetic preferences?.
Methods: Across two experiments, we investigated how the perception and appreciation of dance is influenced by cues to human animacy.
Front Psychol
November 2024
Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Atten Percept Psychophys
December 2024
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Experimenters often ask subjects to rate displays in terms of high-level visual properties, such as animacy. When do such studies measure subjects' visual impressions, and when do they merely reflect their judgments that certain features should indicate animacy? Here we introduce the 'Blindfold Test' for helping to evaluate the evidence for whether an effect reflects perception or judgment. If the same effect can be obtained not only with visual displays but also by simply describing those displays, then subjects' responses may reflect higher-level reasoning rather than visual processing-and so other evidence is needed in order to support a 'perceptual' interpretation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!