A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Different response of plastic film mulching on greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) between chemical and organic fertilization in maize upland soil. | LitMetric

Different response of plastic film mulching on greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) between chemical and organic fertilization in maize upland soil.

Sci Total Environ

Division of Applied Life Science (BK 21+ Program), Gyeongsang National University, 501 Jinju-daero, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea; Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, 501 Jinju-daero, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea. Electronic address:

Published: December 2019

Since plastic film mulching (PFM) can deplete soil organic carbon (SOC) stock but increase greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, PFM utilization is still debating. To determine the influence of PFM on global warming, PFM and no-mulching treatments were installed under chemical and organic fertilizations. In organic fertilization, cover crop was cultivated during the fallow season, and its biomass was incorporated as green manure. To estimate net global warming potential (GWP), two GHG (NO and CH) fluxes and SOC stock changes were determined. SOC stock changes were estimated using net ecosystem carbon budget (NECB), which implies the difference between C input and output. GHG intensity (GHGI) was calculated using net GWP per unit of grain yield. PFM increased maize grain yields by approximately 45-95% over no-mulching under the same fertilization, but it was more effective in organic fertilization, due to higher nutrient input. In contrast, PFM increased seasonal NO and CH emissions by 5-10% and 130-260% over no-mulching under the same amendment, respectively. Compared with no-mulching, PFM decreased more highly SOC stock in organic fertilization (around 140-200%) than chemical fertilization (20-30%), due to higher harvest removal and respired C loss. Irrespective with fertilization and mulching background, net GWP was decided by SOC stock change, which covered about 75-90% of net GWP, and then followed by NO. PFM differently influenced net GWP and GHGI between chemical and organic fertilizations. In chemical fertilization, PFM increased net GWP by 20-30% over no-mulching, but decreased GHGI by 25-35%. However, in organic amendment, PFM highly increased net GWP and GHGI by approximately 115-160% and 30-80% over no-mulching, respectively. PFM in chemical fertilization could be very powerful tool to decrease GHGI via crop yield increase. However, in organic farming, PFM should be carefully selected to increase crop yields, due to more highly increased global warming impact.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133827DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

net gwp
24
soc stock
20
organic fertilization
16
chemical organic
12
pfm
12
global warming
12
pfm increased
12
chemical fertilization
12
organic
9
fertilization
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!