A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The accuracy of a point of care measurement of activated partial thromboplastin time in intensive care patients. | LitMetric

Point of care (POC) devices are increasingly being used in intensive care units to obtain faster results. Data are limited on the performance of these devices in critically ill patients, especially those on heparin infusion. The objective of this study was to assess the agreement between POC activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and laboratory APTT results in patients on heparin infusion and to determine its impact on the clinical decisions regarding heparin dosage. We screened all patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at St George Hospital, Sydney, over a 7-month period and enrolled those who were receiving intravenous heparin infusion. We measured APTT by two methods: bedside POC test (Hemochron Junior Signature Plus) and central laboratory method (STA analyser). We used the Bland-Altman method to test the statistical agreement between the two measurements and Cohen's kappa statistic to test the clinical agreement regarding heparin dosing decision. A total of 176 paired samples from 44 patients (mean age 63 years, 64% males, mean APACHE 18) were analysed. The mean turnaround time for the point of care APTT result was significantly shorter than the central laboratory result (5.0±0.2 min vs 64.6±2.7 min, p<0.0001). Despite the statistically significant correlation, the overall agreement tested by the Bland-Altman method was poor. The 95% limits of agreement were widest (-27.266 to 64.791) and mean percentage bias was highest (24%) for the comparison between POC APTT using citrated blood and laboratory APTT. When POC APTT results of less than 90 seconds using whole blood were compared to laboratory APTT results, the limits of the agreement became narrower (-23.243 to 28.419), and the mean percentage bias decreased to 5%. The agreement between clinical decisions regarding heparin dosage based on the two methods was poor for plain and citrated blood (kappa 0.35 and 0.11, respectively). The POC APTT results were not sufficiently accurate for use in patients on heparin infusion compared to laboratory APTT assay.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2019.05.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

point care
12
intensive care
12
heparin infusion
12
activated partial
8
partial thromboplastin
8
thromboplastin time
8
patients heparin
8
central laboratory
8
care
6
patients
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!