This study used eye-tracking to understand how the order of note sections influences the way physicians read electronic progress notes. Participants (n = 7) wore an eye-tracking device while reviewing progress notes for four patient cases and then provided a verbal summary. We reviewed and analyzed verbal summaries and eye tracking recordings. Wide variation in reading behaviors existed. There was no relationship between time spent reading a section and section origin of verbal summaries.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SHTI190596DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

electronic progress
8
eye tracking
8
progress notes
8
verbal summaries
8
progress note
4
note reading
4
reading patterns
4
patterns eye
4
tracking analysis
4
analysis study
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!