Introduction: An increasing number of studies are using magnetoencephalography (MEG) to study dementia. Here we define a common methodological framework for MEG resting-state acquisition and analysis to facilitate the pooling of data from different sites.

Methods: Two groups of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 84) and healthy controls (n = 84) were combined from three sites, and site and group differences inspected in terms of power spectra and functional connectivity. Classification accuracy for MCI versus controls was compared across three different types of MEG analyses, and compared with classification based on structural MRI.

Results: The spectral analyses confirmed frequency-specific differences in patients with MCI, both in power and connectivity patterns, with highest classification accuracy from connectivity. Critically, site acquisition differences did not dominate the results.

Discussion: This work provides detailed protocols and analyses that are sensitive to cognitive impairment, and that will enable standardized data sharing to facilitate large-scale collaborative projects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6579903PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2019.04.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

methodological framework
8
cognitive impairment
8
classification accuracy
8
biomagnetic biomarkers
4
biomarkers dementia
4
dementia pilot
4
pilot multicentre
4
multicentre study
4
study recommended
4
recommended methodological
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!