Background: Nursing homes (NHs) are federally regulated under uniform standards, whereas assisted living facilities (ALFs) use individual state regulations for staffing, training, and oversight of care quality and safety.
Purpose: To describe ALF staffing, training, inspection, and enforcement regulations for 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, and compare them to NH regulations. Publication of ALF quality and safety outcomes data also was assessed and compared to NHs.
Methods: Regulatory data were compiled from administrative and regulatory data sources, state websites, and regulatory compendia.
Findings: NHs followed a standard set of regulations, whereas ALF regulations varied widely. Overall, state ALF regulations were less stringent than NH in all categories.
Discussion: As ALF populations and acuity levels increase, staffing, training, nursing presence, and outcomes data requirements are warranted, and could be tailored from NH regulations to protect ALF quality and safety.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2019.06.015 | DOI Listing |
Arch Dermatol Res
January 2025
Department of Dermatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Limited urgent access to board-certified dermatologists drives patients to seek dermatologic care at urgent care centers (UCC). UCC are staffed by clinicians with comparatively limited dermatology training, often resulting in lower quality care for acute dermatology conditions. Using a retrospective cohort of 839 referrals, this study investigates health care referral outcomes for patients seeking dermatologic care at UCC.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Infect Dis
January 2025
Division of HIV, ID, and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Long-acting injectables (LAIs) for HIV prevention and treatment could dramatically improve health outcomes and health equity for people with HIV and those who could benefit from pre-exposure prophylaxis. Despite widespread acceptability and demand by providers and potential users of LAIs, implementation has been extremely limited since the introduction of cabotegravir/rilpivirine, the first LAI for HIV treatment, in January 2021, and long-acting cabotegravir, the first LAI for HIV prevention, in December 2021. We report results of a provider survey, conducted by the HIV Medicine Association, which identified LAI implementation barriers related to health insurance processes, staffing and administrative support, drug costs and acquisition, and access for individuals who are uninsured.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFoot Ankle Spec
January 2025
Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Introduction: Increasing diversity in the US health care workforce is a topic of increasing scrutiny and interest. This study analyzes the pipeline of demographic diversity for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited foot and ankle orthopaedic surgery fellowship training.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of medical students, orthopaedic surgery residents, and orthopaedic foot and ankle fellows at US-accredited training programs from 2013 to 2022.
Ann Neurosci
January 2025
Department of Applied Psychology, GITAM School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Background: University students confront a wide range of issues during their pursuit of education. Understanding these issues is essential for developing effective treatments and support systems.
Purpose: This study aims to delineate the landscape of scholarly literature pertaining to psychosocial, academic, and psychological issues among university students.
JAC Antimicrob Resist
February 2025
Division of Medical Microbiology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Background: Research on the contextual drivers of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programme interventions in neonatal units is limited.
Methods: As part of a prospective mixed-methods multidisciplinary neonatal AMS (NeoAMS) interventional study in 14 South African hospitals, we applied a three-phased process to assess implementation barriers and contextual drivers experienced by participating health professionals. The study included: (Phase one; P1) a survey of pre-intervention barriers and enablers; (P2) written feedback during the study intervention phase; and (P3) semi-structured exit interviews.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!