https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=31418490&retmode=xml&tool=Litmetric&email=readroberts32@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09 314184902021020220210202
1522-25948322020FebMagnetic resonance in medicineMagn Reson MedMeasuring extracellular volume fraction by MRI: First verification of values given by clinical sequences.662672662-67210.1002/mrm.27938To verify MR measurements of myocardial extracellular volume fraction (ECV) based on clinically applicable T1-mapping sequences against ECV measurements by radioisotope tracer in pigs and to relate the results to those obtained in volunteers.Between May 2016 and March 2017, 8 volunteers (25 ± 4 years, 3 female) and 8 pigs (4 female) underwent ECV assessment with SASHA, MOLLI5(3b)3, MOLLI5(3s)3, and MOLLI5s(3s)3s. Myocardial ECV was measured independently in pigs using a radioisotope tracer method.In pigs, ECV in normal myocardium was not different between radioisotope (average ± standard deviation; 19 ± 2%) and SASHA (21 ± 2%; P = 0.086). ECV was higher by MOLLI5(3b)3 (26 ± 2%), MOLLI5(3s)3 (25 ± 2%), and MOLLI5s(3s)3s (25 ± 2%) compared with SASHA or radioisotope (P ≤ 0.001 for all). ECV in volunteers was higher by MOLLI5(3b)3 (26 ± 3%) and MOLLI5(3s)3 (26 ± 3%) than by SASHA (22 ± 3%; P = 0.022 and P = 0.033). No difference was found between MOLLI5s(3s)3s (25 ± 3%) and SASHA (P = 0.225). Native T1 of blood and myocardium as well as postcontrast T1 of myocardium was consistently lower using MOLLI compared with SASHA. ECV increased over time as measured by MOLLI5(3b)3 and MOLLI5(3s)3 for pigs (0.08% and 0.07%/min; P = 0.004 and P = 0.013) and by MOLLI5s(3s)3s for volunteers (0.07%/min; P = 0.032) but did not increase as measured by SASHA.Clinically available MOLLI and SASHA techniques can be used to accurately estimate ECV in normal myocardium where MOLLI-sequences show minor overestimation driven by underestimation of postcontrast T1 when compared with SASHA. The timing of imaging after contrast administration affected the measurement of ECV using some variants of the MOLLI sequence.© 2019 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.NordlundDavidD0000-0002-6567-8459Department of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.XanthisChristosCDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.Laboratory of Computing and Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.BidhultSebastianSDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.JablonowskiRobertRDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.KanskiMikaelMDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.KopicSaschaSDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.CarlssonMarcusMDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.EngblomHenrikHDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.AletrasAnthony HAHDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.Laboratory of Computing and Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ArhedenHåkanHDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.engJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't20190816
United StatesMagn Reson Med85052450740-31940Contrast MediaIMAdultAlgorithmsAnimalsContrast MediaFemaleHeartdiagnostic imagingHeart RateHematocritHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedmethodsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedmethodsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMyocardiumpathologyPhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of ResultsSwineYoung AdultECVMOLLISASHAT1-mappingextracellular volumeH.A. is stockholder in Imacor AB, Lund, Sweden. M.C. and H.E. have received consultancy fees from Imacor AB for analysis of cardiac MRI. No other authors report conflicts of interest.
20192620197152019716201981760202123602019817602019128ppublish31418490PMC690000910.1002/mrm.27938Kruhøffer P. Determination of Inulin in Urine and Plasma. Acta Physiol Scand. 1946;11:1–15.Bridge JH, Bersohn MM, Gonzalez F, Bassingthwaighte JB. Synthesis and use of radio cobaltic EDTA as an extracellular marker in rabbit heart. Am J Physiol. 1982;242:H671–H676.PMC30102206802001Tong CY, Prato FS, Wisenberg G, et al. Measurement of the extraction efficiency and distribution volume for Gd‐DTPA in normal and diseased canine myocardium. Magn Reson Med. 1993;30:337–346.8412605Arheden H, Saeed M, Higgins CB, et al. Measurement of the distribution volume of gadopentetate dimeglumine at echo‐planar MR imaging to quantify myocardial infarction: comparison with 99mTc‐DTPA autoradiography in rats. Radiology. 1999;211:698–708.10352594Arheden H, Saeed M, Higgins CB, et al. Reperfused rat myocardium subjected to various durations of ischemia: estimation of the distribution volume of contrast material with echo‐planar MR imaging. Radiology. 2000;215:520–528.10796935Messroghli DR, Radjenovic A, Kozerke S, Higgins DM, Sivananthan MU, Ridgway JP. Modified Look‐Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high‐resolution T1 mapping of the heart. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52:141–146.15236377Lee JJ, Liu S, Nacif MS, et al. Myocardial T1 and extracellular volume fraction mapping at 3 tesla. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011;13:75.PMC326937422123333Flett AS, Hayward MP, Ashworth MT, et al. Equilibrium contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the measurement of diffuse myocardial fibrosis: preliminary validation in humans. Circulation. 2010;122:138–144.20585010Chow K, Flewitt JA, Green JD, Pagano JJ, Friedrich MG, Thompson RB. Saturation recovery single‐shot acquisition (SASHA) for myocardial T 1 mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71:2082–2095.23881866Roujol S, Weingärtner S, Foppa M, et al. Accuracy, precision, and reproducibility of four T1 mapping sequences: a head‐to‐head comparison of MOLLI, ShMOLLI, SASHA, and SAPPHIRE. Radiology. 2014;272:683–689.PMC426364124702727Engblom H, Kanski M, Kopic S, et al. Importance of standardizing timing of hematocrit measurement when using cardiovascular magnetic resonance to calculate myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) based on pre‐ and post‐contrast T1 mapping. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018;20:46.PMC602229029950178Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the cardiac imaging committee of the council on clinical cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;105:539–542.11815441Kellman P, Wilson JR, Xue H, Ugander M, Arai AE. Extracellular volume fraction mapping in the myocardium, part 1: evaluation of an automated method. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14:63.PMC344190522963517Kellman P, Arai AE, Xue H. T1 and extracellular volume mapping in the heart: estimation of error maps and the influence of noise on precision. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:56.PMC370251323800276Kellman P, Hansen MS. T1‐mapping in the heart: accuracy and precision. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16:2.PMC392768324387626Sörensson P, Heiberg E, Saleh N, et al. Assessment of myocardium at risk with contrast enhanced steady‐state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared to single‐photon emission computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;12:25.PMC288538420433716Nordlund D, Kanski M, Jablonowski R, et al. Experimental validation of contrast‐enhanced SSFP cine CMR for quantification of myocardium at risk in acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:12.PMC527857428132648Heiberg E, Sjögren J, Ugander M, Carlsson M, Engblom H, Arheden H. Design and validation of Segment–freely available software for cardiovascular image analysis. BMC Med Imaging. 2010;10:1.PMC282281520064248Xanthis CG, Nordlund D, Jablonowski R, Arheden H. Comparison of short axis and long axis acquisitions of T1 and extracellular volume mapping using MOLLI and SASHA in patients with myocardial infarction and healthy volunteers. BMC Med Imaging. 2019;19:18.PMC638747930795746Deichmann R, Haase A. Quantification of T1 Values by SNAPSHOT‐FLASH NMR imaging. J Magn Reson. 1992;96:608–612.Arheden H, Saeed M, Higgins CB, et al. Reperfused rat myocardium subjected to various durations of ischemia: estimation of the distribution volume of contrast material with echo‐planar MR imaging. Radiology. 2000;215:520–528.10796935Ugander M, Oki AJ, Hsu L‐Y, et al. Extracellular volume imaging by magnetic resonance imaging provides insights into overt and sub‐clinical myocardial pathology. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:1268–1278.PMC335098522279111Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.2868172Fontana M, White SK, Banypersad SM, et al. Comparison of T1 mapping techniques for ECV quantification. Histological validation and reproducibility of ShMOLLI versus multibreath‐hold T1 quantification equilibrium contrast CMR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14:88.PMC355275823272651Gai ND, Stehning C, Nacif M, Bluemke DA. Modified Look‐Locker T 1 evaluation using Bloch simulations: human and phantom validation. Magn Reson Med. 2013;69:329–336.PMC382681522457268Robson MD, Piechnik SK, Tunnicliffe EM, Neubauer S. T1 measurements in the human myocardium: the effects of magnetization transfer on the SASHA and MOLLI sequences. Magn Reson Med. 2013;70:664–670.23857710Kellman P, Herzka DA, Hansen MS. Adiabatic inversion pulses for myocardial T1 mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71:1428–1434.PMC377590023722695Davey RJ, AuBuchon JP. Post‐transfusion red blood cell and platelet survival and kinetics: basic principles and practical aspects Blood Banking and Transfusion Medicine. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2007:455–466.Aime S, Caravan P. Biodistribution of gadolinium‐based contrast agents, including gadolinium deposition. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:1259–1267.PMC282246319938038Holness JL, Fleming JS, Malaroda AL, Warwick JM. 99mTc‐DTPA volume of distribution, half‐life and glomerular filtration rate in normal adults. Nucl Med Commun. 2013;34:1005–1014.23880899Gunasekera RD, Allison DJ, Peters AM. Glomerular filtration rate in relation to extracellular fluid volume: similarity between 99mTc‐DTPA and inulin. Eur J Nucl Med. 1996;23:49–54.8586101McAfee JG, Gagne G, Atkins HL, et al. Biological distribution and excretion of DTPA labeled with Tc‐99m and In‐111. J Nucl Med. 1979;20:1273–1278.536795Fujimura N. The investigation of the absorption of 99mTc gamma‐rays by bone and soft tissue (author's transl). Radioisotopes. 1977;26:371–375.578953Coelho‐Filho OR, Mongeon F‐P, Mitchell R, et al. Role of transcytolemmal water‐exchange in magnetic resonance measurements of diffuse myocardial fibrosis in hypertensive heart disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:134–141.PMC358717023159497Arai AE, Leung S, Kellman P. Controversies in cardiovascular MR imaging: reasons why imaging myocardial T2 has clinical and pathophysiologic value in acute myocardial infarction. Radiology. 2012;265:23–32.PMC344717722993218