A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Environment changes epistasis to alter trade-offs along alternative evolutionary paths. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The fitness effect of mutations can vary greatly depending on both their genetic background (epistasis) and the surrounding environment, with many mutations being beneficial on average but also showing significant variation in their effects.
  • Studies reveal that certain combinations of mutations can actually incur fitness costs in specific contexts, highlighting that the benefits or drawbacks of mutations are influenced by their evolutionary history and the environments in which they were selected.
  • Additionally, there's a trend of diminishing returns in fitness gains, meaning that as you add mutations to already high-fitness genotypes, the added benefits tend to decrease, demonstrating a complex interplay between genetic traits and environmental factors.

Article Abstract

The fitness effect of a mutation can depend on both its genetic background, known as epistasis, and the prevailing external environment. Many examples of these dependencies are known, but few studies consider both aspects in combination, especially as they affect mutations that have been selected together. We examine interactions between five coevolved mutations in eight diverse environments. We find that mutations are, on average, beneficial across environments, but that there is high variation in their fitness effects, including many examples of mutations conferring a cost in some, but not other, genetic background-environment combinations. Indeed, even when global interaction trends are accounted for, specific local mutation interactions are common and differed across environments. One consequence of this dependence is that the range of trade-offs in genotype fitness across selected and alternative environments are contingent on the particular evolutionary path followed over the mutation landscape. Finally, although specific interactions were common, there was a consistent pattern of diminishing returns epistasis whereby mutation effects were less beneficial when added to genotypes of higher fitness. Our results underline that specific mutation effects are highly dependent on the combination of genetic and external environments, and support a general relationship between a genotype's current fitness and its potential to increase in fitness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evo.13825DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interactions common
8
mutation effects
8
fitness
6
mutation
5
environments
5
environment changes
4
changes epistasis
4
epistasis alter
4
alter trade-offs
4
trade-offs alternative
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!