The conflict between pro-self and pro-social behaviour is at the core of many key problems of our time, as, for example, the reduction of air pollution and the redistribution of scarce resources. For the well-being of our societies, it is thus crucial to find mechanisms to promote pro-social choices over egoistic ones. Particularly important, because cheap and easy to implement, are those mechanisms that can change people's behaviour without forbidding any options or significantly changing their economic incentives, the so-called "nudges". Previous research has found that moral nudges (e.g., making norms salient) can promote pro-social behaviour. However, little is known about whether their effect persists over time and spills across context. This question is key in light of research showing that pro-social actions are often followed by selfish actions, thus suggesting that some moral manipulations may backfire. Here we present a class of simple moral nudges that have a great positive impact on pro-sociality. In Studies 1-4 (total N = 1,400), we use economic games to demonstrate that asking subjects to self-report "what they think is the morally right thing to do" does not only increase pro-sociality in the choice immediately after, but also in subsequent choices, and even when the social context changes. In Study 5, we explore whether moral nudges promote charity donations to humanitarian organisations in a large (N = 1,800) crowdfunding campaign. We find that, in this context, moral nudges increase donations by about 44 percent.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6695418PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48094-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

moral nudges
20
simple moral
8
pro-social behaviour
8
promote pro-social
8
moral
6
nudges
5
increasing altruistic
4
altruistic cooperative
4
behaviour
4
cooperative behaviour
4

Similar Publications

Ethics of Organ Donation and Transplantation: Toward Self-Sufficiency.

Exp Clin Transplant

October 2024

President, Libyan National General Authority for Organ, Tissue, and Cell Transplantation, City, Country Tripoli Libya.

Article Synopsis
  • * The article examines different government strategies (opt-in, opt-out, mandated active choice, and voluntary active choice) and critiques their ethical implications regarding nudges that might influence people's decisions unconsciously.
  • * It argues that using nudges can be morally troubling as it undermines true informed consent, stressing that while mandated active choice policies are coercive, other approaches may also compromise autonomy by manipulating decision-making processes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: In Singapore, the healthcare system strongly encourages mothers to breastfeed and breastfeeding initiation is near-universal. However, sustained breastfeeding rates remain low. Little is currently known about how breastfeeding information disseminated in the healthcare setting influences women's breastfeeding experiences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Framing effects from misleading implicatures: an empirically based case against some purported nudges.

J Med Ethics

August 2024

Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore

Some bioethicists argue that a doctor may frame treatment options in terms of effects on survival rather than on mortality in order to influence patients to choose the better option. The debate over such framing typically assumes that the survival and mortality frames convey the same numerical information. However, certain empirical findings contest this numerical equivalence assumption, demonstrating that framing effects may in fact be due to the two frames implying different information about the numerical bounds of survival and mortality rates.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Opt-out vaccination in school and daycare: Reconciling parental authority and obligations.

Bioethics

November 2024

Department of Political Science and Centre for the Experimental-Philosophical Study of Discrimination (CEPDISC), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Article Synopsis
  • There is a growing trend of vaccine hesitancy among parents, leading to lower immunization rates and prompting a need to rethink childhood vaccination approaches.
  • Parents' decisions about vaccinating their children are heavily affected by cognitive biases, which can be leveraged to boost vaccination rates by altering how choices are presented.
  • Implementing opt-out vaccination programs in schools or daycare respects parental authority while promoting the moral responsibility most parents feel to vaccinate their kids.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Why we should not "help bad choosers:" screening, nudging, and epistemic risk.

Med Health Care Philos

September 2024

Interdisciplinary Centre for Ethics, Jagiellonian University, Grodzka 52, Krakow, 31-044, Poland.

One prominent line of support for nudging in screening programs is the claim that nudging can help 'bad choosers' - that is, it can help some patients make choices more in line with their own values and preferences. In this article, I argue that due to the presence of epistemic risk in many screening programs, the argument that nudging can help 'bad choosers' should be revised or rejected. Expanding on the work of Biddle, J.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!