The conflict between pro-self and pro-social behaviour is at the core of many key problems of our time, as, for example, the reduction of air pollution and the redistribution of scarce resources. For the well-being of our societies, it is thus crucial to find mechanisms to promote pro-social choices over egoistic ones. Particularly important, because cheap and easy to implement, are those mechanisms that can change people's behaviour without forbidding any options or significantly changing their economic incentives, the so-called "nudges". Previous research has found that moral nudges (e.g., making norms salient) can promote pro-social behaviour. However, little is known about whether their effect persists over time and spills across context. This question is key in light of research showing that pro-social actions are often followed by selfish actions, thus suggesting that some moral manipulations may backfire. Here we present a class of simple moral nudges that have a great positive impact on pro-sociality. In Studies 1-4 (total N = 1,400), we use economic games to demonstrate that asking subjects to self-report "what they think is the morally right thing to do" does not only increase pro-sociality in the choice immediately after, but also in subsequent choices, and even when the social context changes. In Study 5, we explore whether moral nudges promote charity donations to humanitarian organisations in a large (N = 1,800) crowdfunding campaign. We find that, in this context, moral nudges increase donations by about 44 percent.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6695418 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48094-4 | DOI Listing |
Exp Clin Transplant
October 2024
President, Libyan National General Authority for Organ, Tissue, and Cell Transplantation, City, Country Tripoli Libya.
Int J Womens Health
August 2024
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Introduction: In Singapore, the healthcare system strongly encourages mothers to breastfeed and breastfeeding initiation is near-universal. However, sustained breastfeeding rates remain low. Little is currently known about how breastfeeding information disseminated in the healthcare setting influences women's breastfeeding experiences.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Med Ethics
August 2024
Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Some bioethicists argue that a doctor may frame treatment options in terms of effects on survival rather than on mortality in order to influence patients to choose the better option. The debate over such framing typically assumes that the survival and mortality frames convey the same numerical information. However, certain empirical findings contest this numerical equivalence assumption, demonstrating that framing effects may in fact be due to the two frames implying different information about the numerical bounds of survival and mortality rates.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBioethics
November 2024
Department of Political Science and Centre for the Experimental-Philosophical Study of Discrimination (CEPDISC), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Med Health Care Philos
September 2024
Interdisciplinary Centre for Ethics, Jagiellonian University, Grodzka 52, Krakow, 31-044, Poland.
One prominent line of support for nudging in screening programs is the claim that nudging can help 'bad choosers' - that is, it can help some patients make choices more in line with their own values and preferences. In this article, I argue that due to the presence of epistemic risk in many screening programs, the argument that nudging can help 'bad choosers' should be revised or rejected. Expanding on the work of Biddle, J.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!