Background: Urinary incontinence is a common complaint in all parts of the world, cause of distress, as well as significant costs for both individuals and society. The aim of this study will be to evaluate the rigor of the development of clinical practice guidelines and to identify the recommendations of interventions for urinary incontinence in adult women.

Methods: In this systematic review, clinical practice guidelines will be identified using a prospective protocol through a systematic search of: MEDLINE (via Ovid); EMBASE (Excerpt Medical Database, via Ovid); Web of Science and Virtual Health Library. Specific databases of guidelines for clinical practice will also be searched (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, American Urological Association, and others). Reviewers, independently and in duplicate, will assess the quality of the guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE II). The results will be checked for discrepancies. Differences between the scores equal to or greater than 2 will be considered as discrepant and the final result will be decided by consensus. A comparison of the recommendations of interventions and information about the level of evidence, the degree of recommendation, the level of agreement and the level of acceptance will be described. This step will also be done independently and in duplicate, and the result will be decided by consensus. The results will be presented in tables and the descriptive statistics will be calculated for all domains of the AGREE II instrument as mean (standard deviation) and median (interquartile range).

Results: The results derived from this study will increase the knowledge about the development of recommendations guidelines for urinary incontinence of high methodological rigor. This study may also identify key areas for future research.

Conclusion: This study may guide health professionals, policy makers, and health policy managers in choosing the guidelines for recommendation in clinical practice.

Protocol Registration: PROSPERO - CRD42018116517.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6831340PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016698DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical practice
16
urinary incontinence
16
will
13
practice guidelines
12
guidelines
8
protocol systematic
8
systematic review
8
study will
8
recommendations interventions
8
independently duplicate
8

Similar Publications

The objective of this retrospective observational study was to estimate the prevalence of actinic keratosis (AK) in individuals aged ≥ 40 years in France, to describe the characteristics of affected patients, and to describe treatments. A representative panel of 20,000 households with ≥ 1 member aged ≥ 40 years were invited to participate. Participants who reported AK lesions diagnosed by a physician were eligible.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

BACKGROUND Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) is a rare (1: 1 000 000) autosomal dominant congenital skeletal dysplasia characterized by widely patent calvarial sutures, clavicular hypoplasia, supernumerary teeth, and short stature. Only a minority of the cases are diagnosed early after birth. We present another case of proven CCD presenting with typical neonatal phenotype to promote awareness of this rare disorder.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Stroke has devastating consequences for survivors. Hypertension is the most important modifiable risk factor, and its management largely takes place in primary care. However, most stroke-based research does not occur in this setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Stroke has emerged as an escalating public health challenge among middle-aged and older individuals in China, closely linked to glycolipid metabolic abnormalities. The Hemoglobin A1c/High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HbA1c/HDL-C) ratio, an integrated marker of glycolipid homeostasis, may serve as a novel predictor of stroke risk.

Methods: Our investigation utilized data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study cohort (2011-2018).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Evaluating professional values is crucial to developing effective strategies for integrating them into professional performance and clinical education. A standard questionnaire is an instrument that can be used to evaluate professional values. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Nurses Professional Values Scale-Revised (NPVS-R) among nursing students in the Persian language.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!