A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Cost to Medicare of Bladder Cancer Care. | LitMetric

The Cost to Medicare of Bladder Cancer Care.

Eur Urol Oncol

Department of Surgery, Urology Division, Duke Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

Published: August 2020

Background: Bladder cancer care is costly, including cost to Medicare, but the medical cost associated with bladder cancer patients relative to identical persons without bladder cancer is unknown.

Objective: To determine incremental bladder cancer cost to Medicare and the impact of diagnosis stage and bladder cancer survival on cost.

Design, Setting, And Participants: A case-control study was conducted using 1998-2013 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data. Controls were propensity score matched for diagnosis year, age, gender, race, and 31 Elixhauser Comorbidity Index values. Three incident cohorts, 1998 (n=3136), 2003 (n=7000), and 2008 (n=7002), were compared.

Outcome Measurements And Statistical Analysis: Survival following diagnosis and Medicare payments (in 2018 dollars) were tabulated, and compared between cases and controls.

Results And Limitations: From 1998 to 2008, bladder cancer patients became older and had more comorbidities at diagnosis, although no stage migration or change in survival occurred. Incremental costs (above those associated with controls) were highest during the 1st year after diagnosis and were higher for distant ($47533) than for regional ($42403) or localized ($14304) cancer. Bladder cancer survival was highly stage dependent. After an initial spike in costs lasting 1-2yrs, monthly costs dropped in survivors but remained higher than for controls. Long-term survivors in the full sample accrued cumulative Medicare costs of $172426 over 16yrs-46% higher than for controls. Limitations include omission of indirect costs and reliance on traditional Medicare.

Conclusions: While a bladder cancer diagnosis incurs initial high Medicare cost, particularly in patients with advanced cancers, the cumulative costs of bladder cancer in long-term survivors are higher still. Bladder cancer prevention saves Medicare money. However, while early detection, better therapies, and life extension of bladder cancer patients are worthwhile goals, they come at the cost of higher Medicare outlays.

Patient Summary: The lifetime cost of bladder cancer, reflecting surveillance, treatment, and management of complications, is substantial. Since care is ongoing, cost increases with the length of life after diagnosis as well as the severity of initial diagnosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2019.01.015DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bladder cancer
52
cancer
14
bladder
13
cost medicare
12
cancer patients
12
cost
8
cancer care
8
diagnosis
8
diagnosis stage
8
cancer survival
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!