Shoulder Instability: An American Perspective.

Instr Course Lect

Fellow, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

Published: February 2018

The recognition and management of glenohumeral instability has become an increasingly important aspect of orthopaedic care. Substantial controversy exists with regard to the indications for soft-tissue stabilization versus bony augmentation in patients with glenohumeral instability, particularly among surgeons in the United States and Europe. Although bone loss procedures are frequently performed in the United States and abroad, surgical techniques and indications for bone loss procedures are different. Surgeons should understand current evidence-based indications for arthroscopic versus open soft-tissue stabilization in patients with anterior shoulder instability. Surgeons also should understand the importance of glenoid bone loss with regard to surgical decision making and the indications for Latarjet reconstruction versus allograft reconstruction. Patient-specific factors, including age, sex, sports participation (type and level of play), and the number of instability events that occur before presentation, affect surgical decision making. The technical pearls for successful arthroscopic stabilization, remplissage, open soft-tissue stabilization, and bony reconstruction of the glenoid rim that are discussed in this chapter may increase the likelihood of successful outcomes in patients with glenohumeral instability.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

glenohumeral instability
12
soft-tissue stabilization
12
bone loss
12
shoulder instability
8
patients glenohumeral
8
instability surgeons
8
united states
8
loss procedures
8
surgeons understand
8
open soft-tissue
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!