AI Article Synopsis

  • Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) using UV/free chlorine and UV/chloramines are being tested as alternatives to UV/hydrogen peroxide (HO) for treating reverse osmosis (RO) permeate in wastewater reuse systems.
  • The study focused on three key factors: the speciation of oxidants used in the AOPs, the effectiveness of each method in degrading 1,4-dioxane while minimizing UV exposure, and the potential formation of disinfection byproducts (DBPs).
  • Results showed that UV/free chlorine was the most effective for degrading contaminants, and while DBP levels remained low across all methods, the types of DBPs produced varied, with UV/free chlorine favoring haloacetaldehyde formation and

Article Abstract

Advanced oxidation using UV/free chlorine and UV/chloramines are being considered as alternatives to UV/HO for treatment of reverse osmosis (RO) permeate in treatment trains for the potable reuse of municipal wastewater. This pilot-scale comparison of the three advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) evaluated three factors important for selecting among these alternatives. First, the study characterized the speciation of oxidants serving as the source of radicals within the AOPs to facilitate process modeling. Kinetic modeling that included consideration of the chloramines occurring in RO permeate accurately predicted oxidant speciation. Modeling of the UV/free chlorine AOP indicated that free chlorine is scavenged by reactions with ammonia and monochloramine in RO permeate, such that oxidant speciation can shift in favor of dichloramine over the short (∼30 s) timescale of AOP treatment. Second, the order of efficacy for degrading the target contaminant, 1,4-dioxane, in terms of minimizing UV fluence was UV/free chlorine > UV/HO ≫ UV/chloramines. However, estimates indicated that the UV/chloramines and UV/HO AOPs could be similar on a cost-effectiveness basis due to savings in reagent costs by the UV/chloramines AOP, provided the RO permeate featured >3 mg/L as Cl chloramines. Third, the study evaluated whether the use of chlorine-based oxidants within the UV/free chlorine and UV/chloramines AOPs enhanced disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation. Even after AOP treatment and chloramination, total halogenated DBP formation remained low at <15 μg/L for all three AOPs. DBP formation was similar between the AOPs, except that the UV/free chlorine AOP promoted haloacetaldehyde formation, while the UV/HO and UV/chloramines AOPs followed by chloramination increased chloropicrin formation. However, total DBP formation on a toxic potency-weighted basis was similar among the AOPs, since haloacetonitriles and haloacetamides were the dominant contributors and did not differ significantly among the AOPs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.114939DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

uv/free chlorine
16
oxidant speciation
12
chlorine uv/chloramines
12
advanced oxidation
12
disinfection byproduct
8
potable reuse
8
aop treatment
8
dbp formation
8
uv/chloramines
6
uv/free
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!