AI Article Synopsis

  • Modern forest management aims to balance social, economic, and ecological goals, with the impact of different management methods on forest ecosystems being a key consideration.
  • Two silvicultural systems studied (even and uneven aged) showed varying effects on vertebrate populations over two decades, with birds exhibiting significant changes in abundance, while small mammals and reptiles had more modest but generally positive responses.
  • Overall, the study highlights the importance of spatial and temporal scales in understanding how different management practices affect diverse wildlife groups, enabling better-informed conservation decisions.

Article Abstract

Modern forest management seeks to balance multiple social, economic, and ecological goals. Different management approaches create different types of disturbances in a forest ecosystem and thus also differ in their impacts on plants, animals, and insects. Understanding these impacts is important for conservation of forest ecosystem function, but challenging due to the large spatial and temporal scale over which management occurs. Most past research has focused on relatively small areas, short time scales, and/or a small number of species. To address this, we examined the effects of two common silvicultural systems (even and uneven aged) on abundance and richness of three vertebrate taxa (birds, small mammals, and herpetofauna) over a two-decade period in a temperate hardwood forest in Missouri, USA. The two systems removed a similar amount of biomass overall, but differed in the intensity, number, and configuration of harvests applied. We found that vertebrate population responses varied by taxa, occurred at multiple spatial scales, and were concentrated in the period following the first harvest entry. Birds generally had the largest changes in relative abundance, both positive and negative, following management. Small mammals and reptiles had smaller, but generally positive, responses; amphibians were mixed. Bird species tended to respond in the same way to both silvicultural systems, while small mammals and herpetofauna did not respond consistently. Thus, for birds, the total amount of harvest disturbance across the landscape drives population responses, while for others the size and configuration of individual harvests is likely more important. Synthesizing results across the vertebrate community at large spatial and temporal scales allows managers to better understand trade-offs when making decisions that will affect wildlife in contrasting ways.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.1993DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

small mammals
12
forest management
8
missouri usa
8
forest ecosystem
8
large spatial
8
spatial temporal
8
silvicultural systems
8
mammals herpetofauna
8
population responses
8
management
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!