Objective: Describe the characteristics of infants with NAS and determine if treatment outcomes varied between three protocols.

Study Design: Based on medical record data, infant treatment for NAS-related withdrawal reflected one of three protocols: (1) No rescue dose (n = 836, 52.7%): Prescriber ordered initiation and escalation doses and determined when infants were eligible for weaning, (2) Rescue dose (n = 233, 14.7%): No rescue dose with the addition of a prescriber-ordered rescue dose, (3) Rescue dose by order set (n = 516, 32.6%): Rescue dose with addition of nurse-assisted order of morphine during escalation.

Results: The no rescue dose group had longer length of stay, days to wean, and inpatient days, and greater initial morphine dose than the two rescue dose groups (p < 0.001). Treatment outcomes between the two rescue dose protocols did not differ.

Conclusions: The benefits related to rescue dosing further inform the development of a standardized NAS treatment protocol.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0450-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rescue dose
32
dose
9
three protocols
8
rescue
8
dose addition
8
dose rescue
8
treating infants
4
infants neonatal
4
neonatal abstinence
4
abstinence syndrome
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!