Mosquitoes are carriers of dangerous infectious disease pathogens all over the world. Owing to travelling and global warming, tropical disease-carrying species such as Aedes, Anopheles and Culex spread beyond tropical and subtropical zones, even to Europe. The aim of this study is to investigate the potential of photodynamic agents to combat mosquito larvae. Three different photosensitizers were tested on Chaoborus sp. larvae: TMPyP and TPPS as antimicrobial photosensitizers, and mTHPC as a PDT drug against eukaryotic animal and human cells. Chaoborus sp. is a commercially available harmless species developing translucent larvae similar to the larvae of Aedes, Anopheles and Culex. The uptake of photosensitizers by the larvae was tested by fluorescence microscopy. All tested photosensitizers were observed in the intestinal tract of the living larvae, and none of the photosensitizers was found in the larval tissues. In phototoxicity tests, mTHPC and TPPS did not have any effect on the larvae, while TMPyP killed the larvae efficiently. TPPS is an antimicrobial photosensitizer, mainly phototoxic to Gram-positive bacteria. TMPyP is well known as an efficient photosensitizer against Gram-negative bacteria like most species of the intestinal flora. From this result, we conclude that the photodynamic inactivation of the intestinal flora leads to the death of mosquito larvae. The feasibility of mosquito larvae control by photodynamic inactivation of their intestinal flora instead of the direct killing of the larvae is a promising alternative to other highly toxic insecticides. Compared to insecticides and other biochemical toxins, photosensitizers are not dark toxic. No resistance against photosensitizers is known so far. Thus, the dilution of the active substances by being distributed in the environment, which promotes the development of resistance in biocides of all kinds, does not pose danger. Thus, it reduces the potential side effects on environment and human health.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9pp00156e | DOI Listing |
Malar J
January 2025
Centre for Biotechnology Research and Development, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya.
Background: The current study sought to re-evaluate malaria prevalence, susceptibility to artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), transmission patterns and the presence of malaria vectors in the Kikuyu area of the Kenyan Central highlands, a non-traditional/low risk malaria transmission zone where there have been anecdotal reports of emerging malaria infections.
Methods: Sampling of adult mosquitoes was done indoors, while larvae were sampled outdoors in June 2019. The malaria clinical study was an open label non-randomized clinical trial where the efficacy of one ACT drug, was evaluated in two health facilities.
Infect Dis Poverty
January 2025
Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Background: The cytochrome P450s-mediated metabolic resistance and the target site insensitivity caused by the knockdown resistance (kdr) mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel (vgsc) gene were the main mechanisms conferring resistance to deltamethrin in Culex quinquefasciatus from Thailand. This study aimed to investigate the expression levels of cytochrome P450 genes and detect mutations of the vgsc gene in deltamethrin-resistant Cx. quinquefasciatus populations in Thailand.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMalar J
January 2025
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, 4123, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Background: Members of the Anopheles gambiae complex are major malaria vectors in sub-Saharan Africa. Their larval stages inhabit a variety of aquatic habitats in which, under natural circumstances, they are preyed upon by different taxa of aquatic macroinvertebrate predators. Understanding the potential impact of predators on malaria vector larval population dynamics is important for enabling integrated local mosquito control programmes with a stronger emphasis on biocontrol approaches.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJMIR Public Health Surveill
January 2025
ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110077, India, 91 9205059972.
Background: India is committed to malaria elimination by the year 2030. According to the classification of malaria endemicity, the National Capital Territory of Delhi falls under category 1, with an annual parasite incidence of <1, and was targeted for elimination by 2022. Among others, population movement across states is one of the key challenges for malaria control, as it can result in imported malaria, thus introducing local transmission in an area nearing elimination.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnviron Microbiol
January 2025
Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
The microbiome influences critical aspects of mosquito biology and variations in microbial composition can impact the outcomes of laboratory studies. To investigate how biotic and abiotic conditions in an insectary affect the composition of the mosquito microbiome, a single cohort of Aedes aegypti eggs was divided into three batches and transferred to three different climate-controlled insectaries within the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine. The bacterial microbiome composition was compared as mosquitoes developed, the microbiome of the mosquitoes' food sources was characterised, environmental conditions over time in each insectary were measured, and mosquito development and survival were recorded.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!