An Ex Vivo Evaluation of Tomographic 3-D Ultrasound, B-Mode Ultrasound, CT And MR Imaging to Measure Artery Diameter, Length and Wall Volume.

Ultrasound Med Biol

Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Published: October 2019

Precise measurement of luminal diameter in arteries is important when planning interventional vascular procedures in patients. Measuring wall volume may be important in detecting early artery disease and in the assessment of treatments to prevent atherosclerosis. An ex vivo phantom using porcine arteries was used to evaluate the accuracy with which (i) B-mode ultrasound, (ii) 3-D tomographic ultrasound (tUS), (iii) computed tomography (CT) and (iv) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measured length, diameters and volume. The mean error in inner-to-inner diameter measurements by B mode, tUS, CT and MRI were 0.08 ± 0.26, -0.73 ± 0.96 mm, 0.09 ± 0.55 and 0.60 ± 1.01 mm, respectively. The mean error in outer-to-outer diameter measurements by B mode, tUS, CT and MRI were -1.33 ± 0.61, -1.03 ± 0.35, 0.02 ± 1.00 and -0.47 ± 1.32 mm, respectively. The mean error in volume measurements by B mode, tUS, CT and MRI were -0.54 ± 0.62, -0.06 ± 0.09, 0.01 ± 0.18 and -0.20 ± 0.32 cm, respectively. Errors in length and diameters remain within clinically acceptable thresholds where MRI was the least accurate. tUS was the most accurate method of volume measurement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.07.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

measurements mode
12
mode tus
12
tus mri
12
b-mode ultrasound
8
wall volume
8
length diameters
8
diameter measurements
8
volume
5
tus
5
mri
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!