This study compared spatial speech-in-noise performance in two cochlear implant (CI) patient groups: bimodal listeners, who use a hearing aid contralaterally to support their impaired acoustic hearing, and listeners with contralateral normal hearing, i.e., who were single-sided deaf before implantation. Using a laboratory setting that controls for head movements and that simulates spatial acoustic scenes, speech reception thresholds were measured for frontal speech-in-stationary noise from the front, the left, or the right side. Spatial release from masking (SRM) was then extracted from speech reception thresholds for monaural and binaural listening. SRM was found to be significantly lower in bimodal CI than in CI single-sided deaf listeners. Within each listener group, the SRM extracted from monaural listening did not differ from the SRM extracted from binaural listening. In contrast, a normal-hearing control group showed a significant improvement in SRM when using two ears in comparison to one. Neither CI group showed a binaural summation effect; that is, their performance was not improved by using two devices instead of the best monaural device in each spatial scenario. The results confirm a "listening with the better ear" strategy in the two CI patient groups, where patients benefited from using two ears/devices instead of one by selectively attending to the better one. Which one is the better ear, however, depends on the spatial scenario and on the individual configuration of hearing loss.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6669847PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519858311DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

single-sided deaf
12
srm extracted
12
spatial speech-in-noise
8
speech-in-noise performance
8
bimodal single-sided
8
cochlear implant
8
patient groups
8
speech reception
8
reception thresholds
8
binaural listening
8

Similar Publications

Former studies have established that individuals with a cochlear implant (CI) for treating single-sided deafness experience improved speech processing after implantation. However, it is not clear how each ear contributes separately to improve speech perception over time at the behavioural and neural level. In this longitudinal EEG study with four different time points, we measured neural activity in response to various temporally and spectrally degraded spoken words presented monaurally to the CI and non-CI ears (5 left and 5 right ears) in 10 single-sided CI users and 10 age- and sex-matched individuals with normal hearing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cochlear Implant Sound Quality.

J Speech Lang Hear Res

January 2025

Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Germany.

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to explore how cochlear implant (CI) patients describe sound quality compared to descriptions given by single-sided deaf (SSD) patients for their normal-hearing ears.
  • Participants included patients with different CI brands who completed a questionnaire focused on sound quality using 25 descriptive adjectives, assessing their impressions near activation and years later.
  • Results showed that initial descriptors included terms like "Computer-like" and "Metallic," but evolved to "Clear" over time, indicating that experienced CI users may notice less about sound discrepancies compared to SSD patients who have a normal hearing benchmark.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Perception of voice cues and speech-in-speech by children with prelingual single-sided deafness and a cochlear implant.

Hear Res

December 2024

Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands; Research School of Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands; W.J. Kolff Institute for Biomedical Engineering and Materials Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands. Electronic address:

Voice cues, such as fundamental frequency (F0) and vocal tract length (VTL), help listeners identify the speaker's gender, perceive the linguistic and emotional prosody, and segregate competing talkers. Postlingually implanted adult cochlear implant (CI) users seem to have difficulty in perceiving and making use of voice cues, especially of VTL. Early implanted child CI users, in contrast, perceive and make use of both voice cues better than CI adults, and in patterns similar to their peers with normal hearing (NH).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

There is currently a lack of prospective studies comparing multiple treatment options for single-sided deafness (SSD) in terms of long-term sound localization outcomes. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the objective and subjective sound localization abilities of SSD patients treated with a cochlear implant (CI), a bone conduction device (BCD), a contralateral routing of signals (CROS) hearing aid, or no treatment after two years of follow-up. About 120 eligible patients were randomized to cochlear implantation or to a trial period with first a BCD on a headband, then a CROS (or vice versa).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Surgical resection of vestibular schwannomas (VS) can be responsible for single-sided deafness (SSD). Hearing restoration can be a challenge both for the otolaryngologist and the patient. : In a retrospective series, we analyzed the charts of SSD patients operated on for VS from 2005-2021, checking which type of hearing rehabilitation was chosen.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!