A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 144

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 144
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 212
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1002
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3142
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

YouTube as a Patient-Information Source for Cleft Lip and Palate. | LitMetric

YouTube as a Patient-Information Source for Cleft Lip and Palate.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.

Published: March 2020

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the content and quality of the popular videos on YouTube about the treatment of cleft lip and palate.

Design: Retrospective, YouTube video analysis.

Methods: The 3 keywords "cleft lip and palate surgery," "cleft lip and palate treatment," and "cleft lip and palate repair" were searched on YouTube. After sorted by view-count, final 50 videos were analyzed for general characteristics, primary purpose, information content, relevance, audiovisual quality, and also viewers' interaction index, and viewing rate formulas were calculated for each video. Kruskal Wallis and one-way analysis of variance tests were used to compare the video parameters between good, moderate, and poor information content videos.

Results: The viewing rate was significantly higher in good content videos ( = .003). Most of the videos were uploaded by a clinic (32%), a surgeon (20%), or individuals (22%) who shared their own experience. Most of the videos (54.00%) were classified as moderate general information content and 26.00% were rated as poor, and 20.00% were rated as good. Videos generally involved patient information (60.00%), followed by patient parent's experience (14.00%), and cleft lip and palate surgery (12.00%). The average viewers' interaction index of all evaluated YouTube videos was 0.36.

Conclusions: Although most of the videos were rated as moderate regarding the sufficiency of the information, the results of this study showed that YouTube could still not be considered as a fully reliable source of information for patients on treatment of cleft lip and palate.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1055665619866349DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lip palate
24
cleft lip
16
"cleft lip
12
videos
8
treatment cleft
8
viewers' interaction
8
viewing rate
8
lip
7
youtube
6
palate
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!