C-C chemokine receptor 4 expression in CD8+ cutaneous T-cell lymphomas and lymphoproliferative disorders, and its implications for diagnosis and treatment.

Aims: Patients with aggressive CD8+ cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) progress rapidly and respond poorly to therapy. Confounding treatment planning, there is clinicopathological overlap between aggressive CD8+ CTCLs and other lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs). Hence, improved diagnostic methods and therapeutic options are needed. The aim of this study was to examine C-C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) expression as a diagnostic and therapeutic biomarker in CD8+ CTCLs/LPDs.

Methods And Results: Forty-nine cases (41 patients) with CD8+ CTCLs/LPDs were examined, including CD8+ mycosis fungoides (MF) (n = 14), aggressive epidermotropic CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma (AETCL) (n = 8), subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) (n = 7), CD30+ LPDs (n = 6), primary cutaneous γδ T-cell lymphoma (GDTCL) (n = 6), and others (n = 8). Immunohistochemical tissue staining was performed with a CCR4 monoclonal antibody on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections. CCR4 immunostaining was graded as percentage infiltrate, i.e. high (>25%) and low (≤25%), and the results were correlated with clinicopathological diagnoses. CCR4 expression was seen in 69% of the studied cases. Any CCR4 positivity was seen in all CD8+ MF cases, in 83% of CD30+ LPD cases, in 75% of AETCL cases, in 33% of GDTCL cases, and in none of the SPTCL cases. High CCR4 expression was seen in 79% of CD8+ MF cases versus 33% of CD30+ LPD cases, in 17% of GDTCL cases, and in 12.5% of AETCL cases. Patients with more advanced MF stage had higher CCR4 expression.

Conclusions: CCR4 immunohistochemistry may be an adjunct in distinguishing advanced CD8+ MF from other CD8+ CTCLs/LPDs. Although CCR4 expression may justify therapeutic targeting of this receptor in CD8+ MF, the role of such therapies in other CD8+ CTCLs/LPDs is not yet clear.