AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates different strategies for determining blood pressure treatment eligibility, using the UK as a case study.
  • The research analyzed data from over a million primary care patients aged 30-79 without prior cardiovascular disease to compare four guiding methods for treatment: 2011 NICE guidelines, proposed 2019 guidelines, a standard blood pressure threshold, and a 10-year cardiovascular risk score (QRISK2).
  • Findings revealed that the proportion of patients eligible for treatment varied significantly, with the highest eligibility rate based on blood pressure thresholds and substantial potential for preventing cardiovascular events across all strategies.

Article Abstract

Background: Worldwide treatment recommendations for lowering blood pressure continue to be guided predominantly by blood pressure thresholds, despite strong evidence that the benefits of blood pressure reduction are observed in patients across the blood pressure spectrum. In this study, we aimed to investigate the implications of alternative strategies for offering blood pressure treatment, using the UK as an illustrative example.

Methods: We did a retrospective cohort study in primary care patients aged 30-79 years without cardiovascular disease, using data from the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics mortality. We assessed and compared four different strategies to determine eligibility for treatment: using 2011 UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline, or proposed 2019 NICE guideline, or blood pressure alone (threshold ≥140/90 mm Hg), or predicted 10-year cardiovascular risk alone (QRISK2 score ≥10%). Patients were followed up until the earliest occurrence of a cardiovascular disease diagnosis, death, or end of follow-up period (March 31, 2016). For each strategy, we estimated the proportion of patients eligible for treatment and number of cardiovascular events that could be prevented with treatment. We then estimated eligibility and number of events that would occur during 10 years in the UK general population.

Findings: Between Jan 1, 2011, and March 31, 2016, 1 222 670 patients in the cohort were followed up for a median of 4·3 years (IQR 2·5-5·2). 271 963 (22·2%) patients were eligible for treatment under the 2011 NICE guideline, 327 429 (26·8%) under the proposed 2019 NICE guideline, 481 859 (39·4%) on the basis of a blood pressure threshold of 140/90 mm Hg or higher, and 357 840 (29·3%) on the basis of a QRISK2 threshold of 10% or higher. During follow-up, 32 183 patients were diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (overall rate 7·1 per 1000 person-years, 95% CI 7·0-7·2). Cardiovascular event rates in patients eligible for each strategy were 15·2 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 15·0-15·5) under the 2011 NICE guideline, 14·9 (14·7-15·1) under the proposed 2019 NICE guideline, 11·4 (11·3-11·6) with blood pressure threshold alone, and 16·9 (16·7-17·1) with QRISK2 threshold alone. Scaled to the UK population, we estimated that 233 152 events would be avoided under the 2011 NICE guideline (28 patients needed to treat for 10 years to avoid one event), 270 233 under the 2019 NICE guideline (29 patients), 301 523 using a blood pressure threshold (38 patients), and 322 921 using QRISK2 threshold (27 patients).

Interpretation: A cardiovascular risk-based strategy (QRISK2 ≥10%) could prevent over a third more cardiovascular disease events than the 2011 NICE guideline and a fifth more than the 2019 NICE guideline, with similar efficiency regarding number treated per event avoided.

Funding: National Institute for Health Research.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717081PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31359-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nice guideline
40
blood pressure
36
cardiovascular disease
20
2019 nice
20
pressure threshold
16
2011 nice
16
proposed 2019
12
patients eligible
12
qrisk2 threshold
12
patients
11

Similar Publications

Management of mass casualty incidents: a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg

January 2025

Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.

Purpose: Our aim was to generate evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for the management of mass casualty incidents (MCIs) based on current evidence. This guideline topic is part of the 2022 update of the German guideline on the treatment of patients with severe/multiple injuries.

Methods: MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched to August 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: This study aimed to assess whether adherence to the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST) and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for ankle fractures is associated with reduced complication rates and improved functional outcomes.  Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of all patients who underwent surgical fixation for ankle fractures in August 2023 to January 2024 from an acute hospital. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software, version 29 (IBM Corp.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Characteristics, risk factors and clinical impact of penicillin and other antibiotic allergies in adults in the UK General Practice: a population-based cohort study.

J Infect

January 2025

Centre for Medicines Optimisation Research and Education, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Research Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D24H), Hong Kong Science Park, Hong Kong.

Objective: To assess the characteristics, risk factors and clinical impact of penicillin and other antibiotic allergies labels in general practice in the UK.

Design: Population-based cohort study.

Setting: Primary care in the UK, 2000-2018.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recent Advances in Perioperative Care of Patients using New Antihyperglycaemic Drugs and Devices Dedicated to Diabetes.

Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med

December 2024

Department of Anaesthesia and intensive care Medicine, hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, 78, rue du Général-Leclerc, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. Electronic address:

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common clinical condition with significant health risks for patients and is widely recognised as a major public health concern. Laboratory medicine plays a crucial role in both diagnosing and managing CKD, as diagnosis and staging rely on estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and evaluating albuminuria (or proteinuria). It was evident that the laboratory assessment of CKD in Malaysia is not standardised.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!