The integrated evaluation of the valorization of wine lees to produce value-added products was carried out in this study from a life-cycle perspective. The consumption of steam has been demonstrated as the main hot spot, reaching 85.7% of the impact on Fossil Depletion and 85.3% on Climate Change. Bearing in mind that four different value-added products are produced, a sensitivity analysis was carried out in order to ascertain the influence of the functional unit and the allocation method on the environmental outcomes. The performance of this system was compared to other processes that produce antioxidants from different raw materials. These processes were phycocyanin recovery from Spirulina platensis cyanobacterium, the production of the red antioxidant astaxanthin by microalgae and the valorization of the macroalgae Sargassum muticum. Wine lees valorization showed a better environmental profile throughout the entire life cycle, due to the fact that most of the operations performed are physical (solid/liquid separations, distillations, evaporations, etc.) and do not involve a large consumption of electricity or chemicals. However, there is still room for improvement, and future research should focus on optimizing the extraction of antioxidants from wine lees using two-stages aqueous systems, ultrasonic or microwave assisted extraction, in the pursuit of better performance and lower environmental impact.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.056 | DOI Listing |
Plants (Basel)
December 2024
Institute of Soil and Fertilizer, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550006, China.
Crop rotation is widely recognized as a key strategy to mitigate the adverse effects associated with continuous cropping. Recent studies have demonstrated that biochar has a significant potential for preventing and controlling these challenges. However, the ameliorative effects of green manure rotation and biochar application on continuous pepper cultivation in the karst mountainous regions of Southwest China remain largely unexplored.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Food Microbiol
December 2024
Department of Agronomy Food Natural resources Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, PD, Italy; Interdepartmental Centre for Research in Viticulture and Enology (CIRVE), University of Padova, Viale XXVIII Aprile 14, 31015 Conegliano, TV, Italy; Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry (TESAF), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, PD, Italy.
The management of post-fermentation phase is essential for the protection of wine oxidation. The prolonged contact of yeast lees and wine can help to limit this problem, although off-flavours can originate. It is known that some cellular components (mannoproteins, lipids, glutathione, etc.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Environ Manage
December 2024
INRAE, Univ Montpellier, LBE, 102 Avenue des Etangs, 11100 Narbonne, France.
Food Chem
February 2025
Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Enotria 2/C, 12051 Alba, Italy. Electronic address:
Cold liquid stabulation aims to extract valuable compounds from grape lees before juice clarification. In this study, 7, 14, and 21 days of lees contact were tested on aroma-neutral 'Arneis' and 'Cortese' grape juices vs control. Basic parameters, colour, polyphenols, antioxidant capacity, and volatile organic compounds were assessed throughout winemaking.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Agric Food Chem
November 2024
Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, School of Biotechnology, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Road, Wuxi 214122, China.
Wine lees is a low value biomass resource rich in cellulose, with great potential for producing organic fertilizers and chemicals. However, the high acidity of wine lees limits the catalytic efficiency of the conversion tool endoglucanase. Here, we expressed endoglucanase tCel5A from in , and the combination of promoter AOX1 and signal peptide SUC2 resulted in a highly active expression of 4632.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!