Identification of five frailty profiles in community-dwelling individuals aged 50-75: A latent class analysis of the SUCCEED survey data.

Maturitas

Université Paris Est (UPEC), IMRB, A-TVB DHU, CEpiA EA 7376 (Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing Unit), Créteil, France; Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Clinical Research Unit (URC Mondor), Créteil, France; AP-HP, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Department of Public Health, Créteil, France.

Published: September 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to identify frailty profiles in individuals aged 50-75, using latent class analysis to evaluate health indicators and outcomes over time.
  • A total of 589 participants underwent thorough assessments which helped categorize them into five distinct frailty profiles based on various health indicators.
  • The findings emphasize the importance of recognizing and addressing frailty in younger seniors to improve health outcomes and tailor interventions effectively.*

Article Abstract

Objectives: We sought to identify frailty profiles in individuals aged 50-75 by considering frailty as an unobservable latent variable in a latent class analysis (LCA).

Study Design: 589 prospectively enrolled community-dwelling individuals aged 50-75 (median: 61.7 years) had undergone a standardized, multidomain assessment in 2010-2015. Adverse health outcomes (non-accidental falls, fractures, unplanned hospitalizations, and death) that had occurred since the assessment were recorded in 2016-2017.

Main Outcome Measures: The LCA used nine indicators (unintentional weight loss, relative slowness, weakness, impaired balance, osteoporosis, impaired cognitive functions, executive dysfunction, depression, and hearing impairment) and three covariates (age, gender, and consultation for health complaints). The resulting profiles were characterized by the Fried phenotype and adverse health outcomes.

Results: We identified five profiles: "fit" (LC1, 29.7% of the participants; median age: 59 years); "weight loss, relative slowness, and osteoporosis" (LC2, 33.2%; 63 years); "weakness and osteopenia" (LC3, 21.9%; 60 years); "impaired physical and executive functions" (LC4, 11%; 67 years); and "impaired balance, cognitive functions, and depression" (LC5, 4.3%; 70 years). Almost all members of LC3 and LC4 were female, and were more likely than members of other profiles to have a frail or pre-frail Fried phenotype. Non-accidental falls were significantly more frequent in LC4. LC5 (almost all males) had the highest number of comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors but none was frail.

Conclusions: Our data-driven approach covered most geriatric assessment domains and identified five frailty profiles. With a view to tailoring interventions and prevention, frailty needs to be detected among young seniors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.05.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

frailty profiles
12
individuals aged
12
aged 50-75
12
community-dwelling individuals
8
latent class
8
class analysis
8
adverse health
8
non-accidental falls
8
loss relative
8
relative slowness
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!