Background: Risk stratification for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (NVUGI) bleeding is crucial for successful prognosis and treatment. Recently, the AIMS65 score has been used to predict mortality risk and rebleeding. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), Rockall score, and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in Korea.
Methods: We retrospectively studied 512 patients with NVUGI bleeding who were treated at a university hospital between 2013 and 2016. The AIMS65, GBS, Rockall score, and pre-endoscopic Rockall score were used to stratify patients based on their bleeding risk. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were composite clinical outcomes of mortality, rebleeding, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Each scoring system was compared using the receiver-operating curve (ROC).
Results: A total of 17 patients (3.3%) died and rebleeding developed in 65 patients (12.7%). Eighty-six patients (16.8%) required ICU admission. The AIMS65 (area under the curve (AUC) 0.84, 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.88)) seemed to be superior to the GBS (AUC 0.72, 0.68-0.76), the Rockall score (AUC 0.75, 0.71-0.79), or the pre-endoscopic Rockall score (AUC 0.74, 0.70-0.78) in predicting in-hospital mortality, but there was not a statistically significant difference between the groups (P = 0.07). The AUC value of the AIMS65 was not significantly different from the other scoring systems in prediction of rebleeding, endoscopic intervention, or ICU admission.
Conclusions: The AIMS65 score in NVUGI bleeding patients was comparable to the GBS or Rockall scoring systems when predicting the mortality, rebleeding, or ICU admission. Because AIMS65 is a much easier, readily calculated scoring system compared to the others, we would recommend using the AIMS65 in daily practice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6660932 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-019-1051-8 | DOI Listing |
BMC Gastroenterol
December 2024
Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, 116011, China.
Background And Purpose: Esophageal and gastric varices hemorrhage (EGVH) is a life-threatening condition with the 6-week mortality rate of 15-25%. Up to 60% of patients with EGVH may experience rebleeding with a mortality rate of 33%. The existing scoring systems, such as RS scoring system (Rockall score, RS) and GBS scoring system (Glasgow-Blatchford score, GBS), have limitations in predicting the risk of rebleeding.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Radiol
December 2024
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Objectives: In women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), a CT-based radiomic prognostic vector (RPV) predicted stromal phenotype and survival after primary surgery. The study's purpose was to fully externally validate RPV and its biological correlate.
Materials And Methods: In this retrospective study, ovarian masses on CT scans of HGSOC patients, who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery in an ESGO-certified Center between 2002 and 2017, were segmented for external RPV score calculation and then correlated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
Georgian Med News
September 2024
2A. Tsereteli State University, Faculty of Medicine, Kutaisi, Georgia.
Massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding still remains a challenge, which can cause serious clinical problems especially in high-risk patients. We present a rare case of patient with complex pathology successfully managed by endovascular treatment. A 78-year-old man with a medical history of chronic bronchitis, several minor strokes, type II diabetes, a 30-year history of smoking, and a family history of cardiovascular disease, presented with severe pain on the left side of his chest radiating to his left arm.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
February 2025
Department of Hematology & Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Introduction: The Rockall score and Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) are two scoring systems validated in the evaluation of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). However, no meta-analysis exists to summarize the current data and clarify the use of Rockall score and GBS focusing on non-variceal UGIB. We aimed to evaluate and compare the utility of the Rockall score and GBS in predicting clinical outcomes in non-variceal UGIB.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Med
September 2024
Discipline of Internal Medicine and Ambulatory Care, Prevention and Cardiovascular Recovery, Department VI-Cardiology, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!