Selective vs Complete Sampling in Hysterectomy Specimens Performed for Atypical Hyperplasia.

Am J Clin Pathol

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Vermont Medical Center, Larner College of Medicine, Burlington.

Published: October 2019

Objectives: Atypical hyperplasia of the endometrium is a significant risk factor for uterine endometrioid carcinoma (EC) and an indication for hysterectomy. Standard sampling of these specimens includes evaluation of the entire endometrium to identify possible EC. We evaluated a method of selective sampling in an effort to balance resource utilization with diagnostic accuracy in the detection of EC.

Methods: Histologic diagnoses based on selective sampling (exclusion of every other block of endometrium) were compared with the original diagnosis based on complete sampling.

Results: Double-blinded review of these cases using selective sampling detected EC in 92% of hysterectomies, including all high-grade/high-stage carcinomas. Selective sampling had an 82% agreement with the original diagnoses, with most discordant diagnoses attributable to interobserver variability. Adjusting for interobserver variability increased diagnostic agreement between selective and complete sampling to 96%.

Conclusions: Selective sampling is a feasible method to save time and resources while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqz098DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

selective sampling
20
selective complete
8
sampling
8
complete sampling
8
atypical hyperplasia
8
diagnostic accuracy
8
interobserver variability
8
selective
7
sampling hysterectomy
4
hysterectomy specimens
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!