The interoceptive inference framework suggests that our brain continuously anticipates future states of our body and aims to avoid events that might counteract homeostasis by minimizing prediction errors through active inference; e.g. appropriate actions. If predicted interoceptive models are inaccurate, behavior inconsistent with our long-term homeostatic goals may result; e.g. in failures in self-control. Using a within-subject design including an inspiratory breathing-load task to examine the prediction of aversive interoceptive perturbation and a craving-regulation for palatable foods task, we examined the relationship between self-control and aversive interoceptive predictive models. Those individuals (n = 51 healthy individuals from the general population) who were more accurate in predicting their interoceptive state with respect to anticipated versus experienced dyspnea were significantly more effective in the down-regulation of craving using negative future-thinking strategies. These individuals also scored higher on a measure of trait self-control, i.e. self-regulation to achieve long-term goals. Thus, individuals with more accurate predictive interoceptive models are better able to modulate cravings and thus exert better self-control.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104028 | DOI Listing |
Behav Res Ther
December 2024
Rogers Behavioral Health, Research Center, Oconomowoc WI & Philadelphia PA, 34700 Valley Rd, Oconomowoc, WI, 53066, USA. Electronic address:
The presentation of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) characterized by fear of aversive consequences of eating (fear-ARFID) has both phenomenological and mechanistic similarities to panic disorder. In this narrative review, we propose a shared model of the pathogenesis of the two disorders, centered on interoceptive sensitivity as the key maintenance mechanism. We review the evidence that fear-ARFID, which involves restrictive eating motivated by a desire to avoid aversive events (e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHum Brain Mapp
December 2024
Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Not harming others is widely regarded as a fundamental tenet of human morality. Harm aversion based on the consequences of an action is called utilitarianism while focusing on the action itself is associated with deontology. This study investigated how interoceptive processing affects the neural processing of utilitarian and deontological moral decision-making.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Top Behav Neurosci
November 2024
Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Int J Psychophysiol
December 2024
Research Group Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, KU Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address:
Interoception is crucial to the experience of bodily complaints in chronic conditions. Fear can distort the perception of sensations like breathlessness and pain, yet few studies investigated the effects of conditioned fear on both self-report and neural processing of these sensations. In the current study, we conditioned fear of neutral female faces in healthy adults, pairing certain faces (CS+) with an aversive scream.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPNAS Nexus
September 2024
Department of Biomedical Engineering, New York University, 433 1st Ave, New York, NY 10010, USA.
The skin conductance (SC) and eye tracking data are two potential arousal-related psychophysiological signals that can serve as the interoceptive unconditioned response to aversive stimuli (e.g. electric shocks).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!