Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2019.1632961 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
How to Integrate Neuroethics into a Neuroscience Course - And Drive Student Engagement with Core Concepts.
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ
December 2024
Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205; Center for Teaching Excellence and Innovation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Students are thinking about ethical, moral, and societal implications of science-as individuals and communities- regardless of whether these topics are part of formal curricula. Ethical questions can arise from broad neuroscientific questions (What is consciousness?), emerging topics (e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWounds and Vulnerabilities. The Participation of Special Operations Forces in Experimental Brain-Computer Interface Research.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics
December 2024
Centre for Global Knowledge Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) exemplify a dual-use neurotechnology with significant potential in both civilian and military contexts. While BCIs hold promise for treating neurological conditions such as spinal cord injuries and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the future, military decisionmakers in countries such as the United States and China also see their potential to enhance combat capabilities. Some predict that U.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem: Characteristics, challenges, benefits, and opportunities.
Elife
November 2024
Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States.
In this paper, we provide an overview and analysis of the BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem. First, we compare and contrast the characteristics of the seven BRAIN Initiative data archives germane to data sharing and reuse, namely data submission and access procedures and aspects of interoperability. Second, we discuss challenges, benefits, and future opportunities, focusing on issues largely specific to sharing human data and drawing on = 34 interviews with diverse stakeholders.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFStakeholder perspectives on non-invasive brain stimulation.
Sci Rep
November 2024
Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Lab, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have made great progress in recent years and offer boundless potential for the neuroscientific research and treatment of disorders. However, the possible use of NIBS devices for neuro-doping and neuroenhancement in healthy individuals and the military are poorly regulated. The great potentials and diverse applications can have an impact on the future development of the technology and society.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCaregivers in implantable brain-computer interface research: a scoping review.
Front Hum Neurosci
October 2024
Department of Philosophy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Introduction: While the ethical significance of caregivers in neurological research has increasingly been recognized, the role of caregivers in brain-computer interface (BCI) research has received relatively less attention.
Objectives: This report investigates the extent to which caregivers are mentioned in publications describing implantable BCI (iBCI) research for individuals with motor dysfunction, communication impairment, and blindness.
Methods: The scoping review was conducted in June 2024 using the PubMed and Web of Science bibliographic databases.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!