Background: Hemorrhoid banding is an established treatment for symptomatic internal hemorrhoids with proven efficacy, low cost, and limited discomfort. Although the costs and quality of life following individual banding treatments have been investigated, little is known about cumulative cost and quality of life from sequential banding therapy or how these cumulative costs compare to surgical therapy.
Objective: This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of sequential hemorrhoid banding therapy.
Design: A retrospective review of historic banding treatment patterns was performed. Cost estimates and quality-of-life predictions were applied to observed treatment patterns in a decision-analytic cost-effectiveness model to compare sequential banding therapy with hypothetical surgical intervention.
Setting: A retrospective billing record review for patients treated in a colorectal specialty clinic between 2012 and 2017 was performed.
Patients: Patients initially treated with banding therapy for symptomatic internal hemorrhoids were included.
Main Outcome Measure: The primary outcomes measured were hemorrhoid banding treatment patterns, cost-effectiveness, and net monetary benefit.
Results: Treatment of 2026 patients undergoing hemorrhoid banding identified 94% resolution with sequential banding and 6% requiring delayed surgical intervention. Average cumulative estimated cost for banding therapy was $723 (range, $382-$4430) per patient with an average quality-of-life deficit of -0.00234 (range, -0.00064 to -0.02638) quality-adjusted life-years. Estimates for hypothetical hemorrhoid artery ligation, stapled hemorrhoidopexy, or surgical hemorrhoidectomy found significantly higher cost (3.15×, 4.39×, and 2.75× more expensive) and a significantly worse quality-of-life deficit (1.55×, 5.64×, and 9.45× worse). For patients with persistent disease, continued sequential banding remained the dominant cost-effective therapy.
Limitations: This cost-effectiveness model relies on a retrospective review of billing records with estimated cost and quality of life.
Conclusions: Hemorrhoid banding is a valuable treatment modality with favorable cost-effectiveness. The majority of patients selected for banding find resolution without surgery. For patients with persistent disease, further banding procedures remain cost-effective compared with delayed surgical therapy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A982.
Banda Hemorroidal: UN ANÁLISIS DE COSTO-EFECTIVIDAD: La banda para hemorroides es un tratamiento establecido para las hemorroides internas sintomáticas con eficacia comprobada, bajo costo y malestar limitado. Si bien se han investigado los costos y la calidad de vida después de los tratamientos de bandas individuales, se sabe poco sobre el costo acumulativo y la calidad de vida de la terapia de bandas secuencial o cómo estos costos acumulativos se comparan con la terapia quirúrgica.
Objetivo: Determinar el costo-efectividad de la terapia secuencial de bandas hemorroidales. DISEÑO:: Se realizó una revisión retrospectiva de la historia de los patrones de tratamiento con bandas. Las estimaciones de costos y las predicciones de la calidad de vida se aplicaron a los patrones de tratamiento observados en un modelo analítico de costo-efectividad para comparar la terapia de bandas secuencial con la intervención quirúrgica hipotética.
Ajuste: Revisión retrospectiva de los registros de facturación de los pacientes tratados en una clínica de especialidad colorrectal entre 2012 y 2017.
Pacientes: Pacientes tratados inicialmente con terapia de bandas para hemorroides internas sintomáticas.
Principales Medidas De Resultado: Patrones de tratamiento con bandas de hemorroides, costo-efectividad y beneficio monetario neto.
Resultados: El tratamiento de 2026 pacientes con bandas identificó una resolución del 94% con bandas secuenciales y el 6% requirió una intervención quirúrgica tardía. El costo promedio acumulado estimado para la terapia de banda fue de $ 723 (Rango: $382-$4430) por paciente con un déficit de calidad de vida promedio de -0.00234 (Rango: -0.00064 a -0.02638) años de vida ajustados por calidad. Las estimaciones para la hipotética ligadura de la arteria hemorroidal, la hemorroidopexia con grapas o la hemorroidectomía quirúrgica encontraron un costo significativamente mayor (3.15×, 4.39×, 2.75× más caro) y un déficit de la calidad de vida significativamente peor (1.55×, 5.64×, 9.45× peor). Para los pacientes con enfermedad persistente, la colocación de bandas secuenciales continuas siguió siendo la terapia rentable dominante.
Limitaciones: Este modelo de costo-efectividad se basa en una revisión retrospectiva de los registros de facturación con el costo y la calidad de vida estimados.
Conclusiones: Las bandas de hemorroides son una valiosa modalidad de tratamiento con una favorable relación costo-efectividad. La mayoría de los pacientes seleccionados para terapia con bandas encuentran resolución sin cirugía. Para los pacientes con enfermedad persistente, los procedimientos de colocación de bandas adicionales siguen siendo rentables en comparación con el tratamiento quirúrgico tardío. Vea el Resumen del video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/A982.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001444 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
July 2024
Community Medicine, Karpagam Faculty of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, IND.
Background Hemorrhoids are an extremely common surgical condition affecting millions of individuals worldwide. Treatment options for hemorrhoids vary depending on the severity of symptoms and the type of hemorrhoids. The common non-surgical procedures for grade one and two hemorrhoids include rubber band ligation and sclerotherapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Gen Med
July 2024
Department of Clinic, Kateb University, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Background: Hemorrhoids, common benign anorectal conditions, are associated with various factors, such as low fiber intake, constipation, and pregnancy. Treatment typically involves procedures such as banding and surgery.
Objective: This retrospective investigation aimed to assess the frequency and demography of hemorrhoids in Kabul, Afghanistan.
CVIR Endovasc
May 2024
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Background: Internal hemorrhoids (IH) is a common medical condition that can result in morbidity secondary to bleeding and discomfort. Treatment for IH has traditionally consisted of dietary and conservative medical management, focal treatments including banding and sclerotherapy or hemorrhoidectomy. Recently, rectal artery embolization (RAE) has been studied as a potential treatment for bleeding predominant IH.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
February 2024
Department of General Surgery, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Int J Colorectal Dis
March 2024
Department of Surgery, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Purpose: Rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids can be,painful and there is no consensus regarding the optimal analgesic strategy. This study aims to determine whether there is a difference in post-procedural pain in adults undergoing haemorrhoid banding who have received local anaesthetic, a pudendal nerve block or no regional or local analgesia.
Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar and clinical trial registries were searched for randomised trials of local anaesthetic or pudendal nerve block use in banding.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!