Background: Several radiographic measurements of the humerus can be used to evaluate the treatment outcome of supracondylar fractures in children. Because of the cartilaginous nature of the immature elbow, interpretation of radiographs around this area is sometimes challenging and can be unreliable. This study was conducted to determine the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the six commonly used radiographic measurements of the distal humerus.

Method: The Baumann angle, humero-ulna angle, metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle, radial epiphyseal angle, shaft-condylar angle and lateral capitellohumeral angle of the humerus were measured by two observers on the radiographs of uninjured elbows from 58 children. The values between each measurement were compared and correlated using a Pearson coefficient of correlation to determine the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability.

Results: All of the radiographic parameters showed excellent intra-observer reliability with the correlation coefficient values of the Baumann angle, humero-ulna angle, metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle, radial epiphyseal angle, shaft-condylar angle, lateral capitellohumeral angle as 0.945, 0.95, 0.909, 0.888, 0.961 and 0.975 (p < 0.001), respectively. The inter-observer reliability of the Baumann and humero-ulna angles were also found to be highly correlated at r = 0.843 (p < 0.001) and 0.878 (p < 0.001), respectively. The metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle had poor reliability with r = 0.136 (p = 0.291) while the radial epiphyseal angle, shaft-condylar angle, and lateral capitellohumeral angle demonstrated good reliability with r = 0.675 (p < 0.001), 0.747 (p < 0.001), and 0.686 (p < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusion: The Baumann angle and humero-ulna angle measurements of distal humerus showed excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability. Both parameters represent repeatable and reliable methods for determining the outcome of supracondylar humeral fractures in pediatric population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612040PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2018.07.019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intra-observer reliability
12
angle
12
radiographic measurements
8
determine inter-observer
8
inter-observer intra-observer
8
baumann angle
8
angle humero-ulna
8
humero-ulna angle
8
angle metaphyseal-diaphyseal
8
metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: No studies have explored the reliability of the Rigo classification system using surface topography (ST), which would allow optimization without radiation exposure. This study aims to measure and compare the intra- and inter-observer reliability (Kappa values) and accuracy of the Rigo system between ST and X-ray for overall types and subtypes.

Methods: X-ray and ST images of 31 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients were selected.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Multiple techniques have been proposed for functional fetal cardiology, including pulsed-wave (PW) and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), Myocardial Performance Index (MPI), annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE/MAPSE) and spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC). We aimed to compare these techniques' achievability and reproducibility to determine their clinical utility for each cardiac side.

Methods: Uncomplicated pregnancies from 22 to 39 weeks were recruited and images and volumes stored for offline analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation of the volume and minimum axial area (MAA) measurements between different upper and lower boundaries used for oropharyngeal airway assessment.

Methods: Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans of 49 subjects taken for pre-orthognathic surgical planning were obtained retrospectively from the archives (n = 49; 32 females, 17 males; mean age = 20.9 ± 5.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Validation of a novel tool for automated tooth modelling by fusion of CBCT-derived roots with the respective IOS-derived crowns.

J Dent

December 2024

OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • This study aimed to validate a novel AI tool that combines dental images from two different sources, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scanners (IOS), to create accurate tooth models.
  • The evaluation involved analyzing a dataset from 30 patients, calculating various accuracy metrics for the AI-generated models, and comparing them to both expert manual methods and existing segmentation approaches.
  • Results indicated that the AI-based approach achieved high accuracy similar to manual methods but was significantly faster, suggesting it could improve efficiency in dental practices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Knowing the available dental space in a patient is crucial for orthodontists to develop a good treatment plan.

Objectives: To compare and evaluate the reliability, reproducibility, and accuracy of three measurement methods on models: conventional, mobile app, and digital software.

Materials And Methods: Maxillary and mandibular dental plaster models of 20 subjects with permanent dentition were analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!