Epidemiological studies suggest that humans who receive repeated annual immunization with influenza vaccine are less well protected against influenza than those who receive vaccine in the current season only. To better understand potential mechanisms underlying these observations, we vaccinated influenza-naive ferrets either twice, 10 months apart (repeated vaccination group; RV), or once (current season only group; CS), using a prime-boost regimen, and then challenged the ferrets with A/Hong Kong/4801/2014(H3N2). Ferrets that received either vaccine regimen were protected against influenza disease and infection relative to naive unvaccinated ferrets, but the RV group shed more virus, especially at the peak of virus shedding 2 days post infection ( < 0.001) and regained weight more slowly ( < 0.05) than those in the CS group. Qualitative, rather than quantitative, differences in the antibody response may affect protection after repeated influenza vaccination.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6616337PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41541-019-0123-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

repeated vaccination
8
protected influenza
8
current season
8
ferrets
5
vaccination matched
4
matched h3n2
4
influenza
4
h3n2 influenza
4
influenza virus
4
virus protection
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!