AI Article Synopsis

  • Modern dairy breeding programs often rely on foreign sires, and genomic selection primarily focuses on specific subpopulations, affecting overall genetic improvement in the industry.
  • A gene flow model was developed to analyze the performance of replacement heifers and artificial insemination bulls, testing various breeding strategies based on the reliability of breeding values and genetic contributions from different subpopulations.
  • The findings suggest that shifting genetic contributions towards higher merit sources yields better results over 20 years, but excessive reliance on foreign genetics can decrease the benefits gained from improving domestic genomic prediction accuracy.

Article Abstract

Background: In modern dairy breeding programmes, high contributions from foreign sires are nearly always present. Genotyping, and therefore genomic selection (GS), concern only a subpopulation of the breeding programme's wider dairy population. These features of a breeding programme contribute in different ways to the rate of genetic gain for the wider industry.

Methods: A deterministic recursive gene flow model across subpopulations of animals in a dairy industry was created to predict the commercial performance of replacement heifers and future artificial insemination bulls. Various breeding strategies were assessed by varying the reliability of breeding values, the genetic contributions from subpopulations, and the genetic trend and merit of the foreign subpopulation.

Results: A higher response in the true breeding goal measured in standard deviations (SD) of true merit (G) after 20 years of selection can be achieved when genetic contributions shift towards higher merit alternatives compared to keeping them fixed. A foreign annual genetic trend of 0.08 SD of the breeding goal, while the domestic genetic trend is 0.10 SD, results in the overall net present value of genetic gain increasing by 1.2, 2.3, and 3.4% after 20 years as the reliability of GS in the domestic population increased from 0.3 to 0.45, 0.60 and 0.75. With a foreign genetic trend of 0.10 SD, these increases are more modest; 0.9, 1.7, and 2.4%. Increasing the foreign genetic trend so that it is higher than the domestic trend erodes the benefits of increasing the reliability of domestic GS further.

Conclusions: Having a foreign source of genetic material with a high rate of genetic progress contributes substantially to the benefits of domestic genetic progress while at the same time reducing the expected returns from investments to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction in the home country.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6636067PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0483-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

genetic trend
20
genetic
13
genomic selection
8
breeding
8
breeding programmes
8
rate genetic
8
genetic gain
8
genetic contributions
8
breeding goal
8
domestic genetic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!