Objective: The reoperation rate after lumbar degenerative disease surgery is low. It is difficult to find statistical differences in reoperation rates according to the different diagnoses of lumbar degenerative diseases. National population-based database overcomes the statistical problem by its large cohorts with longitudinal follow-up in a nation. The purpose was to compare the reoperation rates after single-level lumbar spinal posterior decompression and fusion surgeries depending on different preoperative diagnoses of lumbar degenerative disease.
Patients And Methods: We used the Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service national database. The study population was the patients with a diagnosis of a degenerative lumbar disease who underwent single-level decompression and fusion from January 1, 2011, to June 30, 2016. We classified the patients into one of three groups based on diagnosis codes of lumbar disc herniation, spondylolisthesis, or spinal stenosis. A reoperation was defined as repeated decompression and fusion. We considered age, sex, the presence of diabetes, osteoporosis, associated comorbidities, and hospital types as potential confounding factors.
Results: The reoperation rate was higher in patients with spinal stenosis than in those with lumbar disc herniation. However, there was no difference in the reoperation rate between the patients with lumbar disc herniation and those with spondylolisthesis. Male gender and hospital type were risk factors for reoperation.
Conclusion: The incidence of reoperation was dependent on the diagnostic subgroups of lumbar degenerative diseases. This information can help surgeons accurately communicate with their patients and enhance the preoperative informed consent process.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105408 | DOI Listing |
Brain Spine
December 2024
Medical University of Greifswald, Department of Orthopaedics, Greifswald, Germany.
Introduction: Interspinous devices are an alternative to instrumented fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with radiological instability or deformity. The devices claim to improve clinical symptoms by indirect foraminal decompression with fewer complications and similar functional outcomes compared to conventional fusion techniques, and by avoiding a (further) deterioration of the anatomy of the spine while being less invasive than instrumented fusion.
Research Question: Do interspinous devices provide a benefit in combination with a decompression of degenerative LSS?
Material And Methods: In this observational study, 117 patients were treated by decompression surgery alone (n = 37), decompression plus instrumented spinal screw fixation and anterior cage support (n = 41) or decompression plus stabilisation with interspinous devices (n = 39).
Spine J
January 2025
Hoag Orthopedics, 16300 Sand Canyon Ave., Suite. 500, Irvine, CA 92618, United States. Electronic address:
Background Context: Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is a common surgical intervention for treating lumbar degenerative disorders. Increasing demand has contributed to ever-increasing healthcare expenditure and economic burden. To address this, cost-utility analyses (CUAs) compare value in the context of patient outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Orthop
July 2025
Orthopedic Spine Surgeon, USA.
Background: High-grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis often requires surgical intervention for spinal realignment and decompression. This study describes a modified Bohlman procedure utilizing robotic-assisted navigation and a Globus SI-LOK interbody device.
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on three patients who underwent the modified Bohlman procedure for high-grade spondylolisthesis at a single hospital between 2022 and 2023.
Eur Spine J
January 2025
Service de Chirurgie du Rachis, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, 1 Avenue Molière, Strasbourg, France.
Introduction: In asymptomatic subjects, variations of sagittal alignment parameters according to age and pelvic incidence (PI) has been reported. The aim of this observational study was to describe thoraco-lumbar sagittal alignment in patients with degenerative scoliosis and to compare them to asymptomatic individuals, seeking for the specific effect of deformity in similar age and PI groups.
Materials And Methods: Full spine radiographs of 235 asymptomatic subjects and 243 scoliosis patients were analyzed: cervico-thoracic inflexion point (CTIP), thoraco-lumbar inflexion point (TLIP), lumbar lordosis (LL) L1-S1, LL (TLIP-S1), LL superior arch (TLIP-lumbar apex), LL inferior arch (lumbar apex-S1), PI, thoracic kyphosis (TK) T5-T12, TK T1-T12, number of vertebrae CTIP-TLIPandTLIP-S1.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
Introduction: Lumbar degenerative spinal disease is a common, major cause of pain and disability. Titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are popular materials for interbody implants although evidence is mixed on which material is superior in terms of fusion and subsidence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of 3D printed titanium (3DPT) cages in patients undergoing TLIFs, as well as complication profiles based on widely used outcome metrics and reoperation events.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!