Forces acting on the clavicle during shoulder abduction, forward humeral flexion and activities of daily living.

Clin Biomech (Bristol)

Department of Orthopedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.

Published: October 2019

Background: The forces acting on the human clavicle in vivo are difficult if not impossible to measure. The goal of this study is to quantify the forces acting on the human clavicle during shoulder abduction, forward humeral elevation and three activities of daily living using the Delft Shoulder and Elbow Model.

Methods: The Delft Shoulder and Elbow Model and a computed tomography scan of a clavicle were used to calculate the forces and moments acting on the entire clavicle and on three planes within the middle third of the clavicle during the simulated movements.

Findings: The largest resultant force simulated across the clavicle was 126 N during abduction. Maximum resultant moments of 2.4 Nm were identified during both abduction and forward humeral elevation. The highest forces in the middle third of the clavicle were of a compressive nature along the longitudinal axis of the clavicle, increasing to 97 N during forward humeral elevation and 91 N during abduction. Forces in opposite direction along the y-axis were identified on either side of the conoid ligament. The three simulated activities of daily living had similar ranges of forces and moments irrespective of the sagittal plane in which these activities were performed.

Interpretation: Peak forces occurred at different locations on the middle third of the clavicle during different movements. The results create an understanding of the forces and their distribution across the clavicle during activities of daily living. These data may be helpful in the development of clavicular fixation devices.

Level Of Evidence: Biomechanical study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.07.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

forward humeral
16
activities daily
16
daily living
16
forces acting
12
abduction forward
12
humeral elevation
12
middle third
12
third clavicle
12
clavicle
11
forces
9

Similar Publications

Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is increasingly used in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with reliable clinical improvement. Lateralized RSA implants have conferred superior outcomes compared with the original Grammont design in patients with nontraumatic indications. However, in the setting of a PHF, lateralized components can place increased tension across the tuberosity fracture site and potentially compromise tuberosity healing and outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The humeral head is the second most common anatomical site of osteonecrosis after the femoral head. Studies have reported satisfactory clinical outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty to treat osteonecrosis of the humeral head (ONHH). However, there are concerns regarding implant longevity in relatively young patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Biomechanical study of two different fixation methods for the treatment of Neer III proximal humerus fractures.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

December 2024

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Jinshan Branch, Jinshan District Central Hospital, Shanghai, 201500, China.

Background: The lateral locking plate for the proximal humerus is currently the most commonly used surgical procedure for the treatment of elderly proximal humeral comminuted fractures. Previous studies have found that the rate of postoperative complications in patients of proximal humerus fractures with medial column involvement is relatively high. Through biomechanical methods, this study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the conventional lateral locking plate fixation along with the addition of the metacarpal supporting plate on the medial column in the treatment for proximal humeral fractures involving the medial column.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: It is still unclear whether reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has advantages over traditional hemiarthroplasty (HA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) in the treatment of complex shoulder joint diseases. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of RTSA in the treatment of complex shoulder joint diseases and further determine whether it is necessary to expand the indications of RTSA.

Method: We conducted a systematic search of studies published between January 1, 2012 and May 31, 2023 in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is increasingly used in the treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with reliable clinical improvement. However, the preferred techniques for humeral stem fixation are varied and may be influenced by patient and injury characteristics, including bone quality and fracture pattern. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to determine the effect of humeral component cementing and bone grafting on tuberosity healing rates and functional outcomes after RSA for PHFs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!