Cognitive factors related to distress in patients recently diagnosed with cancer.

Objective: This study aims to analyse the association between rumination and thought suppression and the intensity of psychological distress in a sample of patients with recently diagnosed cancer.

Methods: A total of 131 patients with a recent diagnosis of cancer were assessed within 4 months of diagnosis. All participants completed standardized questionnaires to assess psychological distress, rumination, and thought suppression. Multiple regression and logistic regression models were conducted to determine the associations between these variables.

Results: The multiple regression model explained 50% of variance in psychological distress, with rumination independently explaining more than 16% of the variance. Thought suppression, however, was not significantly associated with distress. The logistic model for caseness of depression and anxiety explained, respectively, 33% and 48% of the variance. Anxiety caseness was also associated with social support and self-efficacy.

Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate that rumination is an important explanatory variable of psychological distress in patients with recently diagnosed cancer. Statistical models that include rumination could explain a significant proportion of variance of clinical caseness for both anxiety and depression. These findings suggest that assessing rumination in recently diagnosed patients could improve clinical practice by detecting individuals at greater risk of developing more severe psychological distress. These findings suggest that treating rumination as a key component of the therapeutic objectives of psychological interventions could improve clinical outcomes.