Introduction: Procedures for measuring and counting tracks are time-consuming and involve practical problems. The precision of automatic counting methods is not satisfactory yet; the major challenges are distinguishing tracks and material defects, identifying small tracks and defects of similar size, and detecting overlapping tracks.

Materials And Methods: Here, we address the overlapping tracks issue using the algorithm Watershed Using Successive Erosions as Markers (WUSEM), which combines the watershed transform, morphological erosions and labeling to separate regions in photomicrographs. We tested this method in two data sets of diallyl phthalate (DAP) photomicrographs and compared the results when counting manually and using the classic watershed and H-watershed transforms.

Results: The mean automatic/manual efficiency counting ratio when using WUSEM in the test data sets is 0.97 ± 0.11.

Conclusion: WUSEM shows reliable results when used in photomicrographs presenting almost isotropic objects. Also, diameter and eccentricity criteria may be used to increase the reliability of this method.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23336DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

successive erosions
8
data sets
8
tracks
5
segmentation isotropic
4
isotropic overlapped
4
overlapped tracks
4
photomicrographs
4
tracks photomicrographs
4
photomicrographs successive
4
watershed
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!