Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Children on extracorporeal devices are at increased risk of hypothermia and require circuits with lower extracorporeal volume to avoid blood priming. We performed an in vitro study of the enFlow blood warmer to assess its warming performance and impact on circuit resistance at a high blood flow rate. The enFlow was added on the return line of a continuous renal replacement therapy circuit in a closed circuit primed with expired packed red blood cells (40% Hct). Return venous pressure and temperature pre- and post- both enFlow and Prismaflo II were measured at varying blood flow with different combination of the two blood warmers. Each variable was recorded eight times over 2 min. Return venous pressure was higher with the enFlow but was still within clinically usable range (127.5 ± 4.6 vs. 45.3 ± 1.4 mm Hg at 200 mL/min, P < 0.05). The enFlow was able to achieve post-warmer temperature between 34.1 and 35.2°C even at 200 mL/min with blood, lower than what was observed with crystalloid, but still more effective than the Prismaflo II (P < 0.05 vs. enFlow post-warmer temperature) achieving between 32.8 and 34.0°C. Combining both warmers achieved a higher post-warmer temperature between 35.1 and 36.5°C. The enFlow can warm blood at high flow rates with minimal extracorporeal volume increase (~5 mL) and improve hypothermia prevention but may have resistance issues at the highest flows. The use of this device could benefit pediatric practice where smaller extracorporeal volumes are needed and patients are at increased risk of hypothermia.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.13349 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!