AI Article Synopsis

  • Trabectedin and ifosfamide are effective treatments for advanced soft tissue sarcomas, particularly showing better outcomes for L-sarcomas.
  • In a comparison of the two drugs, trabectedin showed a median progression-free survival of 5.2 months for L-sarcoma patients, whereas ifosfamide had less favorable results.
  • The economic analysis indicated that while trabectedin is more expensive, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €80,000 per QALY gained may be considered acceptable in the Dutch healthcare system.

Article Abstract

Trabectedin and ifosfamide are among the few cytostatic agents active in advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). Trabectedin is most potent against so-called L-sarcomas (leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma). The survival gain and cost-effectiveness of these agents in a second-line setting were analysed in the setting of advanced STS after failure of anthracyclines. A prospective observational trial had previously been performed to assess the use of trabectedin in a Dutch real-world setting. Data on ifosfamide monotherapy were acquired from previous studies, and an indirect comparison of survival was made. A state-transition economic model was constructed, in which patients could be in mutually exclusive states of being preprogression, postprogression, or deceased. The costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for both treatments were assessed from a Dutch health-care perspective. Separate analyses for the group of L-sarcomas and non-L-sarcomas were performed. Trabectedin treatment resulted in a median progression-free survival of 5.2 months for L-sarcoma patients, 2.0 months for non-L-sarcoma patients, and a median overall survival of 11.8 and 6.0 months, respectively. For L-sarcoma patients, trabectedin offered an increase of 0.368 life years and 0.251 QALYs compared to ifosfamide and €20,082 in additional costs, for an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €80,000 per QALY gained. In the non-L-sarcoma patients, trabectedin resulted in 0.413 less life years and 0.266 less QALYs, at the increased cost of €4,698. The difference in survival between drugs and the acquisition costs of trabectedin were the main influences in these models. Trabectedin was shown to have antitumour efficacy in advanced L-sarcoma. From a health economics perspective, the costs per QALY gained compared to ifosfamide monotherapy that may be acceptable, considering what is currently regarded as acceptable in the Netherlands.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6589299PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3234205DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

compared ifosfamide
12
ifosfamide monotherapy
12
patients trabectedin
12
life years
12
trabectedin
9
advanced soft
8
soft tissue
8
l-sarcoma patients
8
non-l-sarcoma patients
8
qaly gained
8

Similar Publications

Urotoxicity of Cyclophosphamide: A Comparison Across Neoplastic, Autoimmune, and Transplant Indications.

Cureus

December 2024

Internal Medicine/Nephrology, Riverside Health System, Yonkers, USA.

We conducted a large-scale disproportionality analysis of the urotoxicity of cyclophosphamide (CYC) and the related drug ifosfamide (IFO) using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, with data ranging from Q4 2012 to Q2 2024. We compared the reporting odds ratio (ROR) of various urotoxicity manifestations of CYC and IFO across patient populations being treated for antineoplastic, immunosuppressive, and transplantation indications. When a wide range of urotoxicity manifestations was aggregated, we found that transplant patients had an increased relative susceptibility to CYC urotoxicity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) have poor outcomes in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of dexamethasone, L-asparaginase, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (DL-ICE) chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients with R/R PTCLs.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 80 adult patients with R/R PTCLs treated with DL-ICE chemotherapy between September 2009 and March 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * It aims to determine if having surgery followed by three courses of adjuvant chemotherapy is as effective as the standard approach of chemotherapy followed by surgery and then more chemotherapy.
  • * The trial is a large, randomized phase III study that began in November 2022 and seeks to confirm that the new treatment method is not inferior regarding overall survival rates.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to explore the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival rates in patients diagnosed with stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS).
  • A systematic review of 16 studies, involving nearly 5,700 patients, found that adjuvant chemotherapy was used by about 38.5% of patients but showed no significant difference in overall survival or disease-free survival compared to those who received observation only.
  • Despite a variety of chemotherapy regimens being assessed, including drugs like doxorubicin and cisplatin, results indicated no clear survival advantage from using adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A study investigated the effectiveness of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue (HDC-ASCR) in treating high-risk pediatric patients with Ewing sarcoma (ES), a rare cancer.
  • Over 17 years, researchers analyzed 20 patients who received this treatment, focusing on their disease response, complications, and survival rates.
  • Results showed promising outcomes with a 5-year overall survival rate of 54.5%, indicating HDC-ASCR could significantly benefit patients compared to traditional treatments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!