Designing in-vehicle signs for connected vehicle features: Does appropriateness guarantee comprehension?

Appl Ergon

Institute for Future Transport and Cities, Coventry University, Swift Road, Coventry, CV1 2TT, UK; National Transport Design Centre, Coventry University, Swift Road, Coventry, CV1 2TT, UK.

Published: October 2019

This paper discusses the design and evaluation of connected and cooperative vehicle in-vehicle sign designs displayed on a mobile phone: Emergency Electronic Brake Lights (EEBL), Emergency Vehicle Warning (EVW), Traffic Condition Warning, and Road Works Warning. Appropriateness and comprehension of each design alternative were assessed using quantitative (i.e. Likert scales) and qualitative (i.e. open-ended questions) methods. Forty-four participants took part in the study and were shown twelve dashboard camera videos presenting a total of eleven designs alternatives, displayed with or without a legend. Despite their appropriateness, EEBL and EVW signs displayed with a legend were better comprehended and less ambiguous than those displayed without a legend. Moreover, displaying a legend below the signs to warn drivers of an emergency braking ahead was efficient in low visibility condition and could potentially increase safety in critical situations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

displayed legend
12
designing in-vehicle
4
in-vehicle signs
4
signs connected
4
connected vehicle
4
vehicle features
4
features appropriateness
4
appropriateness guarantee
4
guarantee comprehension?
4
comprehension? paper
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!